Capitalist Paradise RMB

WA Delegate: The Grand Duchy of Acario (elected 279 days ago)

Founder: The Capitalist Alliance of The-CID

World Factbook Entry

Welcome to Capitalist Paradise! Founded on May 2003, this is a friendly and secure region with exceptionally strong economies, high civil rights and political freedoms. We welcome nations of all categories.

~Constitution: LinkMagna Carta ~Outside Forum: LinkCapitalistParadise.com ~Chat: LinkIRC#capitalistparadise
~Newspaper: LinkCapitalist Paradise Free Press ~Use Our Add On: LinkNS++

CEO: WA Delegate
Minister of Foreign Affairs: The United Oman
Minister of Interior: Armus Republic

President of the Legislature: LadyFasterkittens

Arbiter General: Northern Borland
Supreme Court Chief Justice: Repentant Jihadi
Justice: Capitalist Producers
Justice: Nation of Quebec
Alt. Justice: Vacant

Please endorse our elected Delegate.


Embassies: Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region, The Versutian Federation, Laissez Faireholm, The United Defenders League, The Genesis Corporation, Strategos Prime, The Commonwealth of Kings, Global Right Alliance, NationStates, and the Rejected Realms.

Construction of embassies with Libertatem has commenced. Completion expected in 1 day 2 hours.

Tags: Democratic, Enormous, Capitalist, National Sovereigntist, Offsite Forums, Neutral, Free Trade, Independent, Featured, Anti-World Assembly, and Regional Government.

Regional Power: Extremely High

Capitalist Paradise contains 428 nations, the 18th most in the world.

ActivityHistoryAdministration

Today's World Census Report

The Most Beautiful Environments in Capitalist Paradise

World Census researchers spent many arduous weeks lying on beaches and trekking through rainforests to compile a definitive list of the most attractive and best cared for environments.

As a region, Capitalist Paradise is ranked 15,564th in the world for Most Beautiful Environments.

#NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Peaceful Land-Area of GabeWorldWA MemberLiberal Democratic Socialists“All creatures deserve happiness!”
2.The Benevolent Dictatorship of CanterburieWA MemberInoffensive Centrist Democracy“In God We Trust”
3.The Social Republics of JailpurLiberal Democratic Socialists“Marxism, of the Groucho kind”
4.The Sleeping Cats of GreybrowLeft-Leaning College State“How fortunate the man with none”
5.The Grand Duchy of AcarioWA MemberNew York Times Democracy“Acabar en éxito”
6.The Grand Kingdom of TalAkMaChenCapitalist Paradise“TalAkMaChen - proud nation in the South”
7.The Reality That Is of EsselmanScandinavian Liberal Paradise“I'm an idealist without illusions.”
8.The Republic of MusaquerisDemocratic Socialists“Before raising arms, try raising your legs.”
9.The Unitary State of The Realist PolitiesLeft-wing Utopia“Politics Has No Relation To Morals”
10.The Time Lords of MetacrisisWA MemberInoffensive Centrist Democracy“I am the Bad Wolf. I create Myself.”
Page:  «  1  2  3  4  . . . 43  44  »

Recent polls: “The United States Supreme Court is going to stop dancing around the edges and rule directly on gay marriage. If you were a justice on the high court, what would you rule?”“A belated review of the top stories of 2014, which had the most impact in defining the year?”“It's Oscar season. What movie do you think should win Best Picture?”

Regional Happenings

More...

Capitalist Paradise Regional Message Board

The Militant Master Race of Indiscretions Mum wrote:That may have been true in the days when religions preached the duty of the prolls was obedience to their masters; suicide was a mortal sin and although women could inherit they had to be "protected" by a man who controlled all their worldly affairs. Few today would argue that case (except for Islam where it is still the norm) so does the state have a place in controlling marriage - I don't think so and given the high numbers of serial marriages these days a good pre-nup is a much more essential tool than a marriage certificate!


Women could manage their affairs in Ancient Rome, Egypt and Persia.

The Minister of Bad Behavior of Capitalist Producers wrote:If someone feels they need some legal recognition of their union they can go to a lawyer and have a contract and will drawn up. This is not something the government needs to do.


If there is no contract, that is something the government needs to do.

Hello from Libertatem! As the new Manager of State, I'm pleased to announce that your region is my second stop on our new Diplomatic Circuit Program.

By visiting neighboring regions, I want to open dialogue on issues of mutual security, ideological discussion, and engagement on the level of the ordinary citizen.

I'm glad we could open embassies and start to build a profitable friendship!

The Free Domes of Meridiani Planum wrote:If there is no contract, that is something the government needs to do.

Really? Why do you think the government "needs" to step in. I do not see the overriding threat to national security here.

The Libertatem Diplomat of Funkytopia3 wrote:Hello from Libertatem! As the new Manager of State, I'm pleased to announce that your region is my second stop on our new Diplomatic Circuit Program.

That almost sounds like you are caught in a loop.

The Minister of Bad Behavior of Capitalist Producers wrote:Really? Why do you think the government "needs" to step in. I do not see the overriding threat to national security here.


Governments may do more than just provide "national security". They are responsible for the legal environment of the citizenry. Just for instance, dealing with matters of inheritance.

The Free Domes of Meridiani Planum wrote:Governments may do more than just provide "national security". They are responsible for the legal environment of the citizenry. Just for instance, dealing with matters of inheritance.


I would disagree. In my controversial mind the government is there only to provide national security, law and order, judicial and infrastructure provision.

I don't see how the government is needed in marriages or inheritances. There's no need for a nanny state. I don't see how 'legal marriage' should contain any sort of benefits, advantages or financial 'coupling', over unions or non-married couples.

Couldn't agree more! Governments interference virtually always ends in financial or social ruin. Socialism - the right to spend your money as I like!

How the heck can I be an "Inoffensive Centrist Democracy" when my nation is a Dictatorship??? The only political freedoms allowed are I don't have protestors killed and such, and tolerate them or build infrastructure and public works to keep the populous distracted. How is that a Democracy???

Well me back as a nation. How ya been doin these past years?

Omg I love this game like so much

Married women could manage their own financial affairs in Anglo Saxon England.

As for today - O.K. have equality.

But that means no theft of half of someone's assets on a marriage break up, and no alimony and so on.

Most feminists do not want equality before the law - they want government enforced advantages. Enforced by such thing as the "Family Courts" which take the rules of natural justice - and flush them down the toilet. And government welfare benefits on top.

And the cry the cry that women are paid less for "the same job" is a flat out lie.

However, if women really want my baldness and my shorter lifespan (women tend to live longer) they are welcome to these things - if they really want them.

Still it is not really "women" it is mostly Frankfurt School inspired activists - and the Frankfurt School types were mostly white males (and straight white males).

They were looking for "victim groups" (women, racial minorities, homosexuals - anyone....) because industrial workers had "failed" Marxism by not supporting revolution.

The present P.C. and "Critical Theory" stuff is just another attack on Western civilisation ("capitalism") by other means.

Forum View

by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics