Capitalist Paradise RMB

WA Delegate: The Paradise of Ad Vitam Adsum (elected 295 days ago)

Founder: The-cid

World Factbook Entry

Welcome to Capitalist Paradise! This is a friendly and secure region, a beacon of freedom, high civil rights, and political freedoms that welcomes nations of all categories.

LinkCapitalist Paradise Constitution
LinkHistory of the Capitalist Paradise
LinkCapitalist Paradise Forums (Inactive)

Diplomatic Relations:
Eastern Islands of Dharma, CP Ambassador: Quebecian Ambassador, LinkTreaty

Latest Regional News:

Current General Assembly Resolution at vote:
Sustainable Fishing Act
Delegate Position: Against

Embassies: Eastern Islands of Dharma, Corporate Profit Alliance, and Laissez Faireholm.

Tags: Democratic, Enormous, Capitalist, Offsite Forums, Neutral, and 4 others.Free Trade, Independent, Founderless, and Regional Government.

Regional Power: Extremely High

Capitalist Paradise contains 295 nations, the 29th most in the world.

Administration...

Today's World Census Report

The Largest Trout Fishing Sector in Capitalist Paradise

As a region, Capitalist Paradise is ranked 3rd in the world for Largest Trout Fishing Sector.

#NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Allied Corporate Empire of Northern BorlandCapitalizt“A Good Place to Raise Your Business”
2.The Infection of EdgemasterCompulsory Consumerist State“KICK LOGIC OUT AND DO THE IMPOSSIBLE!!”
3.The Dominion of The CaptainWA MemberCorporate Police State“A friendly place for the upper class”
4.The Three Holy Kingdoms of New MesopelagiaCompulsory Consumerist State“Greed Is Eternal”
5.The Free Secular Federation of Nation of QuebecCorporate Bordello“In Freedom We Trust”
6.The Benevolent Dictatorship of CanterburieWA MemberInoffensive Centrist Democracy“Peace Through Strength”
7.The Allied States of Reed AudioCorporate Bordello“Leave Us Alone.”
8.The Incorporated States of TyrranistamCompulsory Consumerist State“Do what works.”
9.The Most Serene Republic of AvimimusAnarchy“Me ineptum”
10.The Confederacy of AjoriaInoffensive Centrist Democracy“We may be stupid, but we have power!”
Page:  «  1  2  3  4  ... 29  30  »

Regional Happenings

History...

Capitalist Paradise Regional Message Board

Mnai - I oppose Barack Obama because of his far left political background and wild spending (and wild regulating) economic policies. By the way I apologize for implying that you opposed late term abortions - I was thinking of X and forgot about you. Again I apologize for (unintentionally) misrepresenting your position.

Abortion is not a Federal government matter (or should not be - Roe V Wade has nothing whatever to do with the actual Constitution of the United States as written) so that does not come into it. Social matters in general should be nothing to do with the Federal government - as it should have no "police power".

What are your reasons for opposing Barack Obama?

Do you oppose his (lifelong) Marxist associations? His deep hatred of the West in general and the United States in particular (just as his mother, Stanley Ann, and chidhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, did - and on and on at Occidental and then Columbia and then the city of Chicago).

Do you oppose his TRILLIONS of Dollars of extra government spending?

Do you oppose his vast increase in REGULATIONS (for example via the EPA and NLRB)?

If you do then we have a large measure of AGREEMENT.

Oh by the way - I am certain you can use a search engine.

As a much younger person that me all this internet stuff should be easy for you. So if you really "do not know" about Barack Obama's activities as a State Senator (on the 2002 State Bill that would have protected babies that survived abortion and were OUTSIDE the mother's body).

Then you DO NOT WANT TO KNOW.

You have plenty of chances to find out (it would have been easy for you to find out what Jill Stanek and other people who testified before the Illinois State Legislature found out about the real Barack Obama - the man behind the "compassionate" mask) - and you have chosen not to.

So you DO NOT WANT TO KNOW.

To The Allied States of Reed Audio

I oppose Barack Obama for his far right authoritarian principles. I believe him to be a fascist; not much better than Stalinist except he sides with corporations instead of the collective. Although I can't speak to his associations, I don't believe he is a Marxist at all. A Marxist, for example, would not have assassinated Osama bin Laden, as bin Ladin is a leftist who wants Western corporations to stop supporting the fascist governments that control Muslim people. Obama would not have allowed the war in Afghanistan to spill so quickly into Pakistan, as the entire war in Afghanistan is only happening four two reasons: first, so American companies can build an oil pipeline from Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan, and into the Arabian see so Kazakh oil will be more accessible to the world market and not have to flow through Russia, and second, for American Fortune 500 companies can continue to profit off of the international heroine trade, neither of which were possible under the Taliban regime.

Obama has also opposed the lifting of the embargo on Cuba, even with most countries (including all Latin American countries) trying to get him to.

Obama has opposed the ending of the drug war, and is presently doing more to target pot users and distributes than any other president in US history. Cannabis has the potential to replace 80% of existing prescription drugs and almost any American can grow it in their own homes for just the price of the seeds, and an increase in their water and electricity consumption (which if their only growing for themselves, won't be a lot). As a medicine, it's non-addictive, hasn't killed anyone, extremely effective at fixing most ailments, and the only health risk is a slight chance of getting bronchitis. It also has a lot of other uses which could compete with businesses aside from professional medicine and pharmaceutical industries. Here's a pic that my brother stumbled on: http://kingstoncompassion.org/cannabisandcapitalism.jpg Exactly how does keeping cannabis illegal and siding with all of those companies, forcing such an effective product off of the market and out of the hands of the American people something that one could quantify as Marxist? Marxism is about deliberately empowering the collective against the individual, and this action only empowers certain individuals against the collective. The action Obama is taking is deliberately anti-Marxist, and fascism and Marxism are polar opposites.

As for your claim of his hatred of America, I have no idea. Fascists generally keep their motives secret, and it's difficult to tell of they view their own country with love, hatred, or disdain. Did Hitler love or hate Germany? Maybe both? I don't know.

Obama's total government spending has been around $5 trillion. $4 trillion of this has already been covered. Only $1 trillion of his spending has actually added to the debt. Only adding $1 trillion is much lower than that added by most recent presidents. Even so, it was never his money to spend, and it was entirely acquired by theft, but so was all the spending by almost every other president we've ever had, so I mostly consider that to be an irrelevant point.

The Environmental Protection Agency was formed in 1970. The National Labor Relations Board was formed in 1935. If memory serves me, Obama became president after those institutions came into existence...

We have strong disagreement as to why we should oppose Obama.

Okay, so with my youthful use of search engines, I found that Obama did oppose a bill that would have granted a living fetus legal protection, even if doctors felt there was no way to save the child. What I also found was that at the same time, Obama supported a nearly identical bill which ended up passing and Bush signed into law. The only major difference between the two bills was that the first bill that you demonize him for not supporting did not contain protections for Roe v. Wade, whereas the nearly identical bill he did support and was signed into law does contain protections for Roe v. Wade, SO you were half right; he did oppose the bill, but not for the reason you claimed, and it turns out he believes exactly the opposite of what you believed he believes on the issue of live birth abortions.

I think that you hate Obama for all of the reasons Bill O'Reilly or Glenn Beck wants you to hate him... which in my view, are all make believe reasons, which is frustrating, because there are plenty of good ones.

The worst thing: When you have a deficit that adds onto the debt, how exactly are you to have it paid off? You can't raise taxes because people will just take their money and put it somewhere else, and apparently you cannot cut spending, except military and 'discretionary' spending, which technically isn't part of the budget, but just spending without said budget.

To The Constitutional Republic of Sucrati,

Why can we not cut spending other then military and discretionary?

Why does the United States even need a military? We only ever use it to police the world and get involved in things we ought not get involved in. Why not disband it until a threat that actually warrants its existence emerges?

@Mnai: You're saying that we should effectively disband our entire armed forces? I can understand not doing the World Police thing, but we still NEED one for defensive purposes. Besides, the Constitution mandates that Congress funds our military.

@Xyanth: We cancut spending However those politicians who promised the world to their voter base, refuse to cut spending for social services, and other 'expenditures' that are borderline unconstitutional, such as subsidies. The Democrats have promised to cut spending for raised taxes, and like magic, the Republicans have raised taxes without the cut spending. But when the Republicans stand their ground about not raising taxes in a freaking recession/depression, they are the bad guys anyway. See what happens when our own government and MSM can get away with determining your status based on some form of monetary level?

The middle class IS shrinking, however, it's more people heading into the welfare recipient class. For the most part, it's not their faults. As less of the so called 'rich' flee the country because it isn't wise to invest their wealth here, that means less tax revenues for the government. Who will foot the bill? Either:

You force the so called remains of the middle class to cough up the dough, while the 'gimme gimme' crowd get more and more to stay silent against our government.

OR

You can force everyone to pay something into the system by fixing our broken tax system, and create a system where everyone, regardless of income level, as equal citizens or legal residents.

The Free Republic of Afforess

4 days ago

I would like to take a moment and note the passing of the long time native and Capitalist Paradise member, 3y3r001yu.

wait...do you mean he CTE'd or do you mean that he like, kicked the bucket?

People our leader is bad.He abusess his power.We know this.Endorse me.Overthrow him.Endorse me,Winner12345 in a quest for freedom and a competent and successful leader.Just go to my page,scroll down and press endorse.

Well Mnai that was very interesting.

First of all I never said that the EPA or NLRB were CREATED by Obama - I pointed out how he was USING them.

Which rather contradicts your idea that he is in the pocket of the corportions.

But, hey, why should a "left libertarian" let facts get in the way of your tidy ideology.

As for Bill O'Reilly - I doubt you know the opinions of this man at all. His opinions on "gun control" (pro), TARP (also pro), and the oil companies (he blames them for high fuel prices) might shock you.

Glenn Beck?

I was a libertarian when Glenn was still on the booze (I did tell you I have been around awhile).

Barack Obama "rightwing" (although you admit you have not spent any time studying his life).

As for Fascism (and National Socialism - which grow out of German "War Socialism") these movement do not benefit most companies (not even most big companies), as dividend payments tend to be controlled by the state and any company (no matter how large) can be ordered about (regardless of the will of its owners) whenever the state feels like it.

By the way the idea that Mussolini (a life long socialist) was in the pocket of big business was an invention of the Soviet propaganda machine in the 1920s -- interesting to see that some people still believe it.

For Germany - see Turner (on the myth that "Big Business" was behind the Nazis).

And (as any libertarian should know) see F.A. Hayek "The Road To Serfdom", the "Constitution of Liberty" and "Law, Legislation and Liberty".

And (better) see Ludwig Von Mises "Omnipotent Government" and "Human Action".

Specically how German National Socialism (and Italian Fascism) turned business owners into "shop managers" - toys of the state.

Have a nice day.

Oh by the way.....

Your figures on government spending under Barack Obama seem to be something I have encounted before.

I.E. Counting all spending approved before October 2009 as "Bush spending" (even though even this wild spending person was AGAINST it).

So spending Bills that Obama supported (and Bush did not sign) somehow become "Bush spending". Even though BARACK OBAMA signed them (and Bush did not).

In reality Barack Obama has added more to the national debt in three years than even wild spending Bush managed in eight years.

And you clearly have not looked up the testimony that I asked you to look up. But continue to defend Comrade Barack (whilst pretending to oppose him) anyway.

Not good my dear. Remember you are pretending to be a libertarian - you have to get this "false flag" thing right (otherwise even an old son of a ..... like me will be able to spot what you are).

Time you went to bed - without your supper.

Latest Forum Topics