Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region RMB

WA Delegate (non-executive): The Libertarian Society of Da Firenze (elected 67 days ago)

Founder: The Pirates of Xyanth

BoardActivity History Admin

World Factbook Entry

We invite political debate here. Many times these debates grow heated. If you are the type of person whose feelings get hurt over sarcasm or having your reality challenged, you do not belong here. People complaining to NS moderators over posts on this RMB will be banned for their own good. Better they should be in a place they can be happy.

Raiders, grief givers and spammers will be ejected and banned without warning. Spamming includes multiple one line entries. Those that enter the region, post and run will also be banned.

Embassies: Capitalist Paradise, The Ascendancy, United Republic of Nations, Cashnatchee, Eladen, Coalition of Democratic States, Laissez Faireholm, New Republica, The Alliance Pocket Universe, League of Christian Nations, Unitarian Union, Union of Nationalists, Libertatem, The Western Empire, The Illuminati, Tobiasan, and 15 others.The Disappointment Isles, Classical Liberal Union, The Heavily Armed States of Zohiania, Continent of Xenonia, Southeastern Wisconsin, Zentari, International Union, libertarian, United Alliances, The New Axis Powers, International Republican Union, Dyemis, Time for Britain to leave the EU, Turkic Union, and The Christian Nations.

The embassy with New Republica is being withdrawn. Closure expected in 19 hours.

Tags: Democratic, Capitalist, National Sovereigntist, Social, Industrial, Free Trade, Independent, Modern Tech, Medium, and Libertarian.

Regional Power: Moderate

Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region contains 32 nations, the 352nd most in the world.

Today's World Census Report

The Most Avoided in Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region

Nations ranked highly are considered by many to be the most inhospitable, charmless, and ghastly places to spend a vacation, or, indeed, any time at all.

As a region, Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region is ranked 1,084th in the world for Most Avoided.

#NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The True Believers of Free Market ParadiseCorporate Bordello“Marginal Profit Is The Blood Of Life”
2.The Parent Company of HollipWA MemberCapitalist Paradise“Now with 50% added outsourcing!”
3.The Pirates of XyanthCapitalizt“If there ain't a buck in it, then pack it in.”
4.The Free Republic of JakaniaCapitalist Paradise“Peace and Prosperity Through Freedom and Responsibility”
5.The Federal Republic of IcookitAnarchy“Don't Tread on Me”
6.The Libertarian Society of Da FirenzeWA MemberAnarchy“Non Buelvo Sin Vencer”
7.The Individualist Nation of ZelonAnarchy“Observe the NAP!”
8.The Asst Min of Bad Behavior of The Ambassador to the CLFRCapitalist Paradise“Let see if we can work this out.”
9.The Patriarchy of Drake RiverAnarchy“A corner of the empire on which the sun never shines”
10.The Commonwealth of Domestic Corporate AmericaCorporate Police State“True wealth is through profit.”
Page:  «  1  2  3  4  »

Regional Poll • Is General Lee's battle flag, more widely known as the Confederate flag a symbol of racism?

The Pirates of Xyanth wrote:We've all seen the news. We've all heard the arguments. Time to vote on it.

Voting opened 4 days ago and will close in 3 days 18 hours. Open to residents. You cannot vote as you are not logged in.

Last poll: “Should we respect Rachel Dolezal's choice of race?”

Regional Happenings

More...

Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region Regional Message Board

Have any of you read The Communist Manifesto?

The Republic of Condealism Envoy Unit Four wrote:My point is that allowing for people to change their racial appearance would not improve race relations; it would worsen them. People of various ethnicities would react poorly to others mimicking them - after all, this is evident even in a non-"transracial" context (for instance, the concept of "n-word privileges"). Like I said, our society handles race by dividing people on an abstract basis of contrived differences. If we want to deconstruct these racial barriers, we should do so on the basis of mutual respect and understanding, not through idolatry and playing pretend.

Every argument you just made can be applied to transgenders. Frankly, I don't see the difference.

The Free Confederate Anarchies of Anti-Obamian People wrote:Have any of you read The Communist Manifesto?

Didn't have to. Saw it at work real time in Russia, Cuba and China. Even China's figured out that dog won't hunt.

Got a new poll up. Tell us what you think about General Lee's battle flag, more commonly known as "The Confederate Flag."

Confederate States of America! Look at my flag. It's a mix of the Anarcho-Capitalist flag (the yellow and black parts) and the CSA flag (the rest). Lincoln was the worst president in the history of the USA. It is in the Constitution that states may secede if they dislike the current form of government. Jefferson, Adams, and many other framers of the U.S. Constitution said that they may. Lincoln himself even admitted it! Lincoln's predecessor, Buchanan, let the first seven southern states secede, although he didn't like it, because it was their Constitutional right to do so. Then Lincoln got in office, some more states seceded and he went berserk and wages a war against them. He is the only U.S. president ever to fight a war without a declaration of war and also the first president ever to attack a nation that was not a military threat to him. He is the only U.S. president ever to wage a war for the sole purpose of conquering the land of the attacked country. The CSA was a sovereign nation, and Lincoln just decimated it. The Civil War, or the War of Northern Aggression, as it is more aptly named, was also not about freeing or keeping the slaves. Lincoln once said that he would not use whatever force was necessary to end slavery, but he would use whatever for necessary to collect taxes. He was the first president ever to impose and income tax, which is a form of slavery (Slavery is the taking of on'e work without compensation; your income is your work , therefore income tax is slavery.). Lincoln was also the first president ever to suggest banning negros from his state. He was in favor of deporting back to the CSA escaped slaves. Anti-slavery? I think not! The slaves also weren't treated very poorly. Their masters wanted them to work; you don't make something work by killing it. It's like having a dresser that squeaks. By the logic of the propagandists today, southern slave owners would have taken a hatchet and smashed it to pieces, and done the same to the slaves with a whip. They would have been destroying their property, their livelihood if they did something like that. The horrific abuses you hear about were often few and far between. If your dresser squeaks, you knock a couple of times and put some DW40 on it, not kill it. Also, slavery eventually collapses on itself. The slaves will only work as hard as it takes not to get whipped, whereas if they were getting paid, they would work harder, to get more money. Slavery is a misallocation of resources. If you have some genius, but he's a slave, he is not going to innovate and make society better as much as he could if he were in a free society. For all their greatness, the Romans, built on slavery, never got as far as we did. All countries that had slavery in the nineteenth century abolished it peacefully. This would have happened in the CSA had Lincoln not conquered it. The War of Northern Aggression wasn't about slavery; it was about freedom. The CSA was seceding from the tyrannical U.S. government. The South was for the free market; the North was for protectionism. Under Lincoln, the government's size increased greatly and started upward to where it is now. If Lincoln hadn't attacked the sovereign nation of the CSA, we wouldn't have had to deal with the other bad U.S. presidents, FDR, Johnson, and Obama. We could be in the CSA or other North American country. I'm related to Robert E. Lee, but no bias, all that was true. If you're a conservative, you can't say Lincoln was a good president.

I'm currently reading The Communist Manifesto. For the most part it's pretty funny if you're a capitalist. In his introduction, Engels says that Marx's theory would do ask much for history as Darwin's did for biology.

Phrontisteries and Xyanth

The Free Confederate Anarchies of Anti-Obamian People wrote:Lincoln was the worst president in the history of the USA.

You meant second worse, right?

Phrontisteries

Constitutionally Lincoln was horrible and deserved to be impeached after issuing the infamous General Orders #33 on April 3, 1862.

Phrontisteries

Agreed, Free Market Paradise. He was a war criminal. He actually backed a constitutional amendment that would have made it constitutionally impossible to abolish slavery. Horrible person. I can't believe the leftist media and education make him out to be a hero.

And Xyanth, no, I did mean worst. Who is the worst president in your opinion?

Phrontisteries

The Free Confederate Anarchies of Anti-Obamian People wrote:Agreed, Free Market Paradise. He was a war criminal. He actually backed a constitutional amendment that would have made it constitutionally impossible to abolish slavery. Horrible person. I can't believe the leftist media and education make him out to be a hero.

And Xyanth, no, I did mean worst. Who is the worst president in your opinion?

Obama. Hands down the worse thing that happened to the country since the Stock Market crash in 1929. The man make Carter look brilliant.

Phrontisteries

I would consider Obama the second-worst president. Then FDR and Johnson. The reason I say Lincoln is the worst is because he started a war that didn't need to be started and greatly increased the power of the federal government. Without him, North America would be more like Europe and one wouldn't necessarily have to deal with him if they were in the Confederate States of America or some other North American country.

The Free Confederate Anarchies of Anti-Obamian People wrote:I would consider Obama the second-worst president. Then FDR and Johnson. The reason I say Lincoln is the worst is because he started a war that didn't need to be started and greatly increased the power of the federal government. Without him, North America would be more like Europe and one wouldn't necessarily have to deal with him if they were in the Confederate States of America or some other North American country.

FDR is a kind of a mixed bag. He was indeed a disaster for the economy and an impediment to the recovery from the market crash. That said, he was the right man to command the armed forces during World War II. That puts him light years ahead of the current occupant of the White House. If someone was to attack Pearl Harbor today, Obama would be giving press conferences the next day apologizing to who did it.

Forum View

by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics