«12. . .990991992993994995996. . .1,1431,144»
Also, Nat, Night, I revived and moved a few of my puppets in here to help out. Patrick the Fox, B H Obama, Radioactive childhood memories, and The Dogtoaster are all mine, so don't be alarmed.
I suggest we kill everyone.
Everyone.
I also will be barely active during this event due to, quote, "having sh*t to do."
Thus I shall be appointed Lord Protector.
I read that in Starscream's voice.
You've seen nothing, Prime.
Exactly. Through becoming a zombie wasteland.
I suggest we all start answering our issues if you haven't already been doing so. Military, healthcare, and education should be priorities. If I recall from last year, government expenditures influenced the effectiveness of the options we chose.
As a general unit, however, I think we - as a fairly liberal region - are solid.
I definitely have a nice shot at curing due to my obsession with universal healthcare.
universal healthcare all up ins with me too
i say we just all go with cure and shut the borders down ASAP, but that's just me being boring ol' neutral good i guess
I think we should also have to leave the region and nuke people with the cure after that
We always cure.
We ought to shake things up, y'know?
I honestly can't decide whether I want to do the (arguably) "right thing" and cure, or join the zombie hordes (just for the sake of everyone dying). But I think I'm leaning towards cure.
Post self-deleted by Condunum.
You know, I've been thinking about that.
I really don't want to join the horde, because being a horde of zombies is boring.
We should start preparing the nuke reserves.
Going cure or fighting is also good for roleplaying, too
As I have a pretty large (almost 30%) Defense budget, I will most likely Fight the zombies.
So why does these three aspects influenced the effectiveness of the options we chose?
Mine is more than 30% of defense budget.
With less than 2% of healthcare and education budget.
Then you'd probably have more success exterminating them, if I understand how this works.
Yeah, Zompire is cool in theory, but terrible in practice.
I'm using my puppets to go for defense, education, and healthcare, so I can either research or fight if needed.
So, here's my thinking:
Defense is your military budget, so a more well-funded (and most likely better-equipped) military will be more effective at fighting the hordes. If your defense budget is 0%, your troops (or, if you don't even have a dedicated army, your citizens) are pretty much going to have to use their hands and whatever improvized weapons they can get their hands on, while a more well-equipped military can carpet bomb hordes besieging a city, or use fancy hand-held microwaves to asplode the Zacks' heads from a safe distance.
Likewise, a better healthcare budget means better and more efficient means of distributing the cure, and better research budget means quicker and more efficient development of the cure.
If anybody has facts that would prove/disprove those notions, I'd appreciate it.
How many puppets you have, Gren?
My puppets are not very organized in its funds (granted, they are called puppets for reasons)
4. Most are small, though, because I don't answer issues very often, and thus, have no real incentive to log into them to keep them alive for very long. I've got one that's a little over a billion, though.
I keep this puppet for general purposes. As in jump into General thread.
The other one mainly for games, F7 and some.
My main account deals with RP.
«12. . .990991992993994995996. . .1,1431,144»
Advertisement
