Anarchy RMB Anarchy was Liberated by Security Council Resolution # 135

WA Delegate: The Fluffy Fascist Ducks of Duck-Boss (elected 170 days ago)

Founder: Illichia

World Factbook Entry

Huzzah! Huzzah! Huzzah! This region proved no match for a charge by The Black Riders!

Anarchy is occupied by LinkThe Black Riders! Visit our lair by clicking: Linkhere

Into the battle rode the following riders:
Gest
Kknight
Scooby-Doo
Suchasmallthing
Ridersyl

Defenders banned: Enough to block out the sun

Embassies: The Black Riders.

Tags: Large, Featured, Founderless, Liberated, and Recruiter Friendly.

Regional Power: Very High

Anarchy contains 69 nations, the 170th most in the world.

ActivityHistoryAdministration

Today's World Census Report

The Best Weather in Anarchy

The following nations were determined to have the best all-round weather.

As a region, Anarchy is ranked 2,991st in the world for Best Weather.

#NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Democratic Republic of New Sensual DelightsWA MemberNew York Times Democracy“Be Sensual Be Clean”
2.The AnarCity of YoriZWA MemberAnarchy“Ⓐrtists, not Ⓐrmies!”
3.The Nomadic Peoples of NatapocWA MemberCivil Rights Lovefest“In the oligarchy we trust not.”
4.The Anarchist Confederation of AnarchadomWA MemberLeft-wing Utopia“Ni Dios, Ni Amo, Ni Patria, Ni Partido, Ni de Futbol”
5.The CNT Supporters of Nova CastlemilkWA MemberLiberal Democratic Socialists“Money? What was that? Grandad”
6.The Libertarian Socialist Nation of Echelon StateWA MemberCivil Rights Lovefest“Provehito In Altum”
7.The Anarcho-syndicalist Galaxies of SeeyaWA MemberCivil Rights Lovefest“We'll see where this experiment in democracy takes us”
8.The Community of BlankoviaWA MemberNew York Times Democracy“All matters in our own hands.”
9.The Free Enterprise Communists of Sierra LyricaliaWA MemberCivil Rights Lovefest“Pugnas non incipimus; definimus.”
10.The Burlesk Brommende Bijen of BijenkorfDemocratic Socialists“bzzzzzzz”
Page:  «  1  2  3  4  . . . 6  7  »

Regional Happenings

More...

Anarchy Regional Message Board

Post by United trolls suppressed by a moderator.

Show

Post by Stephen and Matilda suppressed by Duck-Boss.

The AnarCity of YoriZ wrote:GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION AT VOTE
Child Pornography Ban
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.

Your Regional WA Delegate, The Fluffy Fascist Ducks of Duck-Boss, has voted AGAINST this resolution.

Shame on you raiders.

This really is shameful. I know it's a game, but even so why would you vote against this?

Post by United trolls suppressed by a moderator.

Why?

Maybe because it's winning by ~8000 votes and doesn't matter if voted against?
Maybe because it's satirical?

Or just maybe,because Anarchy natives are trying to be morally superior and failing miserably and DB threw you a bone

Show

Post by YoriZ suppressed by Duck-Boss.

In this regard, it is easy to be morally superior.

Show

Post by Total anarchya suppressed by Duck-Boss.

there is one thing i still fail to understand. Even after months of trying:

How on earth is it possible that some people care to spend 170 days (that's almost half a year) only to ruin the game for others...

i mean... why?! invasions, tag-raids, week-long occupations... i would not enjoy it but at least i can imagine that some people do have fun with it. but this? no... i think someone badly needs attention.

And all those people endorsing him? why?!?! Can't you think for your self? Don't you see what you're doing here?
Anarchy was one of those really old regions that managed to hold a daily active group of players throughout the years. Why are you endorsing the destruction of such a thing? Do you know that you have the choice to NOT do this?

questions, questions, questions... Are humans behind computer-screens really so egoistic? must be...

Show

Post by Natapoc suppressed by Duck-Boss.

The Undefined Lawless Territory of Total anarchya wrote:there is one thing i still fail to understand. Even after months of trying:

How on earth is it possible that some people care to spend 170 days (that's almost half a year) only to ruin the game for others...

i mean... why?! invasions, tag-raids, week-long occupations... i would not enjoy it but at least i can imagine that some people do have fun with it. but this? no... i think someone badly needs attention.

And all those people endorsing him? why?!?! Can't you think for your self? Don't you see what you're doing here?
Anarchy was one of those really old regions that managed to hold a daily active group of players throughout the years. Why are you endorsing the destruction of such a thing? Do you know that you have the choice to NOT do this?

questions, questions, questions... Are humans behind computer-screens really so egoistic? must be...

Sadly, probably.

The reason they are holding anarchy is primarily because of peer pressure.

TBR is mocked by other raiders for just focusing on easy things like "tag raids".

The occupation of anarchy is what they use to "save face" with other raiders. It's why they will stay as long as they can and why they are desperate to get us to leave so they can seal a victory.

TBR has risked their whole reputation among raiders on Anarchy. If they can't keep anarchy they will be seen as ineffective and lacking in true ability to destroy active regions.

As long as there are still "Natives" here TBR has not truly won and has not sealed a victory.

Show

Post by YoriZ suppressed by Duck-Boss.

The Nomadic Peoples of Natapoc wrote:Sadly, probably.

The reason they are holding anarchy is primarily because of peer pressure.

TBR is mocked by other raiders for just focusing on easy things like "tag raids".

The occupation of anarchy is what they use to "save face" with other raiders. It's why they will stay as long as they can and why they are desperate to get us to leave so they can seal a victory.

TBR has risked their whole reputation among raiders on Anarchy. If they can't keep anarchy they will be seen as ineffective and lacking in true ability to destroy active regions.

As long as there are still "Natives" here TBR has not truly won and has not sealed a victory.

If you both are confortable with it, I would love to take this to the forum thread.

lol Duck boss why did you vote against the ban on child pornography?

Show

Post by YoriZ suppressed by Duck-Boss.

I can answer that for you as The Marshal of Gest explained to me in the forumthread:
"I voted against because I dislike those numbers that NS shows when something new has happened or something is up to vote. I probably glanced at the title and the vote count, the latter being vote determinative. I definitely didn't read the proposal, still haven't because I don't care. I don't care about the vote because this is not reality. Nothing that we do or don't do has any effect on the real world. Leave the moralism to Sunday school teachers."
He just doesn't care.

Forum View

by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics