by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

Sorry! Search is currently disabled. Returning soon.

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .4,2674,2684,2694,2704,2714,2724,273. . .12,18012,181»

Kraeshia wrote:Quote editor!

NEVER!

Alghoria wrote:NEVER!

I challenge you to a duel!

*Aegis Crush!*

*wonders if certain instances of quote editing should be considered as spam*

Darkesia, Hariko, United russoasia, and A fish in the sea

Sorry.

A fish in the sea

*summons URA, Hariko, BBD, and Dark*

We need you to clean up the RMB. Take a mop and a bucket, and get working!

Post by Kraeshia suppressed by Darkesia.

Alghoria wrote:I am a poop head.

GET FRICKIN REFRECTORED!

A fish in the sea wrote:*summons URA, Hariko, BBD, and Dark*

We need you to poop. Take a mop and a bucket, and get working!

United russoasia

ARGH.

What is this [REDACTED].

Yy4u wrote:*wonders if certain instances of quote editing should be considered as spam*

Yes, YEs, YES please!

A fish in the sea

United russoasia wrote:ARGH.

What is this [REDACTED].
Yes, YEs, YES please!

The criteria for such must be outlined.
Instances defined as to when such edit quoting is spam.
What is excessive or not.
When is it appropriate to engage in the 'practice' and not be considered spam

United russoasia

Yy4u wrote:The criteria for such must be outlined.
Instances defined as to when such edit quoting is spam.
What is excessive or not.
When is it appropriate to engage in the 'practice' and not be considered spam

Doing it once in a while as a joke is alright, and snips are ok. Editing quotes to malicious intent is bad.

A fish in the sea and Big Bad Badger

United russoasia

I.e. changing a post's content in a way that isn't funny, is immature, or is too mature is banjection material.

Post self-deleted by Mediobogdum.

Anyone else?

This is future rmb policy being created here, speak up people. This will be used as reference to what is good game play. Non WA and WA alike. This is your region!
Help shape it!

It takes a village!

Darkesia and United russoasia

A fish in the sea

Yy4u wrote:Anyone else?

This is future rmb policy being created here, speak up people. This will be used as reference to what is good game play. Non WA and WA alike. This is your region!
Help shape it!

It takes a village!

  • Repeat offending

  • Spamming

  • Swearing

  • Objectionable subjects

  • Offending Material

  • Umm... that stuff

In my view any nation which, in quoting another post, thereby changes its meaning in a derogatory or otherwise offensive manner should be shown the door to TRR.

United russoasia

A fish in the sea wrote:
  • Repeat offending

  • Spamming

  • Swearing

  • Objectionable subjects

  • Offending Material

  • Umm... that stuff

We're talking about quote editing, here...

Also, editing quotes to make them unoffensive, as Vandoosa did earlier during our troll incident, is perfectly ok.

United russoasia wrote:

Also, editing quotes to make them unoffensive, as Vandoosa did earlier during our troll incident, is perfectly ok.

Lack of punctuation?
Substituting letters/numbers for entire words?
Grammatical errors?

United russoasia

Yy4u wrote:Lack of punctuation?
Substituting letters/numbers for entire words?
Grammatical errors?

As quote edits?

Hell no.

If you don't have anything better to do than that you have a sad life.

Yy4u wrote:Lack of punctuation?
Substituting letters/numbers for entire words?
Grammatical errors?

Impossible to exactly define and, therefore, must be left to the discretion of the delegate to ban or banject. I would have already given the heave-ho to one nation who has very recently been guilty of rmb severe quotation 'massaging' offences.

United russoasia

Sorry.

United russoasia

Mediobogdum wrote:Impossible to exactly define and, therefore, must be left to the discretion of the delegate to ban or banject. I would have already given the heave-ho to one nation who has very recently been guilty of rmb severe quotation 'massaging' offences.

I would have a couple by now, but again if it were currently my place to do such there would have been warnings.

Alghoria wrote:Sorry.

Appreciated, but take heed. But you are not alone ...

United russoasia wrote:I would have a couple by now, but again if it were currently my place to do such there would have been warnings.

Yes, first the warning. I do not believe in waiting for three strikes.

All Good People, United russoasia, and A fish in the sea

Sorry guys. RL isn't affording me time to track the RMB real close. And half the time I don't understand the weird pseudo-RP that goes on, so I skip over it.

If you feel someone needs the heave ho, please drop me a TG with a link to the offending stuff. I am generally obliging of such reports.

United russoasia

Mediobogdum wrote:Appreciated, but take heed. But you are not alone ...
Yes, first the warning. I do not believe in waiting for three strikes.

Nor do I.

Darkesia wrote:Sorry guys. RL isn't affording me time to track the RMB real close. And half the time I don't understand the weird pseudo-RP that goes on, so I skip over it.

If you feel someone needs the heave ho, please drop me a TG with a link to the offending stuff. I am generally obliging of such reports.

Verstanden und danke, delegate. However, I think this incident will THE singular warning for such behavior.

A fish in the sea

United russoasia wrote:However, I think this incident will THE singular warning for such behavior.

Read this sentence again.

«12. . .4,2674,2684,2694,2704,2714,2724,273. . .12,18012,181»

Advertisement