«12. . .415416417418419420421. . .653654»
Post by Borduria22 suppressed by Marxist-feminists.
Sad that you could not even hold onto Muslim Brotherhood -- the Jihadi region which you usurped.
It is under Nazi control now.
Glory to Nazism and Fascism !
Post self-deleted by Comradeland.
Thats fine, we can trade for The URAP, or go hang out in our hip corner bar in Right Wing Uprising
Post self-deleted by Marxist-feminists.
To quote an excerpt from Comrade Kim Jong Il's "Socialism of Our Style":
"Bourgeois parliamentarism and the bourgeois multi-party system are not the expressions of democratic politics but the tools for exercising a bourgeois dictatorship. Capitalists make use of a bourgeois parliament for legalizing their harsh exploitation and oppression over the working masses. The rulers of capitalist society hold elections to cover up bourgeois parliamentarism with democracy, but their election campaign is not a competition of different political views but a race ruled by the power of money. The monopolists who spend plenty of money in elections and their representatives hold a majority in bourgeois parliament. Such a bourgeois parliament cannot adopt any law or resolution for the popular masses. The adoption of laws and resolutions by a bourgeois parliament is nothing but a mere procedure through which to justify what has already been decided by the monopolists and their representatives outside the parliament."
Marxist-feminists, The Stalinist Union, Comradeland, Communal earth, and 2 othersThe socialist republic of emporia, and Pjongjang
Well there's the PSL (Party for Socialism and Liberation) who run in the US elections, there pretty good from what I've read and watched about them, despite them using the Bourgeois system, so if you do vote, Vote PSL, I think they have a charter in almost every state in the US, so its possible they have one in your state.
Also, not to offend, but yes the world is Laughing at the US elections, well a lot of people in Australia are anyway, it. Would be funny if US Imperialism did not play such a large role in Australia's affairs and whoever wins will directly affect our Nation, not that anything will really change, we will still have our racist, Anti-Communist government, still have our pro-Imperialist media and our Nazi like refugee prison camps.
Marxist-feminists, The Stalinist Union, and Kazirstan
Donald Trump conducted illegal business in Fidel Castro's Communist Cuba: report
The "Castro Connection" story claims Trump spent at least $68,000 in 1998 for a business foray into Cuba — even though any corporate activity in the Caribbean country was completely illegal without government approval at the time.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.nydailynews.com/amp/news/politics/donald-trump-conducted-illegal-business-communist-cuba-report-article-1.2810972?client=ms-unknown
Or, if that's not enough, we can put NAZI EUROPE and the Greater German Reich on the table. ;)
The Democratic Confederation of Gayism
Theres alot of fascist symbols going on in that region.
Korea Resilient! Socialism in the DPRK
I know this article is posted in the the important links page, but I think it is a very descriptive piece regardless.
https://marxistleninist.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/korea-resilient-socialism-in-the-dprk/
Kanatistan, Comradeland, The socialist republic of emporia, and Pjongjang
What economic system is more socialistic and/or marxist; Soviet model where the state make plans, directives and distribution, or Yugoslav model where workers of every company decided plans, directives and distribution?
I've read that DPR Korea have worker's democracy, does that mean their economic model is similar to Yugoslav?
I'm pretty sure Warsaw Pact economies were similar to Soviet model, since they were in COMECON, but i don't know about Cuban economic system of the Cold War and modern-day. I would like to know more about that, if anyone have pieces of information.
Thats a good question comrade, but I think you are approaching it from the wrong angle. As communists we are not trying to be "more" socialistic at all times. We are trying to advance socialism, there is a big difference (though some dont see it that way).
The answer is the correct economic system is the one that advances socialism in the implementation region better. The soviet model of centralization makes a lot more sense for a huge country like the SU with its huge diversity in cultures, races, geographic location/needs, ect. Tito's model was more a response to being cut off from Soviet support after the split with Stalin.
Cuba's economic model took after the Soviet one, and became heavily reliant on Soviet support for decades. This actually caused a rift between Castro and Che.
The Stalinist Union, Kanatistan, Kim yong il, The socialist republic of emporia, and 1 otherPjongjang
This is very true, comrade. To once again quote Comrade Kim Jong Il:
"In the past, many countries, while building socialism guided by Marxism-Leninism, applied the propositions of Marxism-Leninism advanced long before as they were, and imitated the Soviet experience in a mechanical manner. Several East European countries are typical examples. These countries had been under the occupation of fascist Germany during the Second World War before being liberated by the Soviet army, and embarked on the road of socialism with the help of the Soviet Union. Because they considered that unconditional application of the propositions of Marxism-Leninism and of the Soviet experience was the way to adhere to revolutionary principles and internationalism, they accepted Soviet-style socialism as it was. As a matter of fact, we cannot deny the historic exploits and experience of the Soviet Union which built socialism for the first time in the world. However, the experience of the Soviet Union in socialist construction is, in every point, the reflection of the then historical conditions and the concrete situation of the Soviet Union. The experience the Soviet Union had gained in the course of building socialism single-handed for the first time in the world, surrounded by the imperialists, can hardly accord fully with the specific situation of other countries. If the existing experience is considered absolute and accepted dogmatically, it is impossible to build socialism properly, as the times change and the specific situation of each country is different from another. Several East European countries, notwithstanding, transplanted Soviet-style socialism on their lands as it was, thus making it impossible for socialism to display its advantages to the full."
The Stalinist Union, Communal earth, The socialist republic of emporia, and Pjongjang
Philippines leader likens himself to Hitler, wants to kill millions of drug users
Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte appeared to liken himself to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler on Friday and said he would "be happy" to exterminate three million drug users and peddlers in the country.
His comments triggered shock and anger among Jewish groups in the United States, which will add to pressure on the U.S. government to take a tougher line with the Philippines leader. Duterte recently insulted President Barack Obama and in a series of remarks he has undermined the previously close relationship between Manila and Washington.
In a rambling speech on his arrival in Davao City after a visit to Vietnam, Duterte told reporters that he had been "portrayed to be a cousin of Hitler" by critics.
Noting that Hitler had murdered millions of Jews, Duterte said: "There are three million drug addicts (in the Philippines). I'd be happy to slaughter them.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/philippines-leader-likens-himself-to-hitler-wants-to-kill-millions-of-drug-users/ar-BBwOz7c?OCID=ansmsnnews11
-------
This article is worth sharing because the U.S claims it wants an "ironclad" relationship with the Philippines, despite obvious signs of reactionary politics in the country. It says he would "gladly" slaughter at least 3 million of the nations supposed drug users. Where are the embargoes and the sanctions? Clearly the U.S is again an imperialist power who only supports anyone who continues capitalist production. Genocide is not an issue for them.
The Stalinist Union, Kazirstan, The socialist republic of emporia, and Pjongjang
That's insane that a President can straight up get away with saying that they would slaughter three million of their own people. What a world we live in.
American ally, so its ok.
Assuming Clinton wins the presidency, and the Filipino president keeps up his rhetoric, the Philippines might find itself more a Russian ally and Abu Sayyaf with a large increase in manpower, funding, and arms.
Not to say Trump would be a better choice, he obviously wouldn't be. He just seems more likely to be ok with the open murder of 3 million people. And has a man crush on Putin, and seems likely to be in the pocket of some Russian oligarchs.
Not even wrong. It is so sad that so many people are persuaded by such a person that would have the diplomacy skills to pretty much start more wars... but Hillary had that email scandal, so she must be hoooooorible! I mean yeah, she has her bad points, and I would rather neither of them got into power. But Trump as president? I hope Canada has space.
How about Gary Johnson, third party? Haha
Ugh, not a fan. He is basically a republican that smokes pot. That is it. And he wants to privatize a lot of things, which I VERY much disagree with. He is no better than either of them.
Man if there was only a good candidate, like Bernie Sanders, Socialism is better than Hillary or Trump
He is softcore socialism, but I guess some kind of class consciousness would likely spring from that than from either Hillary, Trump, or Johnson.
«12. . .415416417418419420421. . .653654»
Advertisement
