by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

Sorry! Search is currently disabled. Returning soon.

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .237238239240241242243. . .1,0831,084»

But in order to be a nationalist you must first be patriotic.

Atsuria and Neu tyrol

Xozanero wrote:But in order to be a nationalist you must first be patriotic.

Not necessarily but it's one way to get there, that's for sure.

Other possible routes include but are not limited to: Absorbing nationalism from home and parents, through interest and study in that nation's history and through education.

Neu tyrol

Atsuria wrote:"In my opinion, both suck."
what's wrong with nationalism ? Coming from you i'm quite surprised. I think that nationalism should be an absolute value to any fascist, afterall fascism has it's roots in "radical nationalism"
On nationalism, I agree but I wish to remind you that while what you speak may be true when it comes to central europe for example but in scandinavian countries that are still further away from the situation of having "no borders" and such, being farther away from the unifying corrput EU and the movement of culture between nations is not at the same level, there is still strong nationalistic feelings without having a larger empire with it's redefined nationalism.
I always thought the difference between the two is more about what makes them nationalists or patriotics. Any Nationalist worth his credibility is a person who is bound to his homeland, it's culture and history without any terms.He loves his nation no matter what, no matter how bad things are, no matter the situation. He would die for his country, go to war for his country, at extremes do anything for his country.
A patriotic is a milder form, he's one who loves his country for what it is and what it has given to him.
He looks at the country only from the present time, not from the future nor from the past.He can dress up in patriotic clothing and show is patriotism verbally and with symbols, but beyond that it's pretty much nothing.

The revolutionary-nationalism inherent in Fascism (a la 1922) was to forge an industrialised and modern nation (ie Italy) in order to compete with other industrialised and modern nations (ie Great Britain and France). As it is we (in 2016) inhabit a post- industrial and post-modern world, in which globalization (Americanism) informs our economics, poltics and mass-culture.

The European Union, in its current form, is a manifestation of this globalization and a power bloc of the US hegemony. As it is, any nationalist endeavour within the major US client states of Western Europe will be hard pushed to extricate itself from this Americanism in particular as the US presents itself as being against the virulent Islamism that threatens Europe but also as a counter to the homegrown Cultural Marxism that infects the European psyche and intellect.

The whole of Europe is under threat from internal and external forces, not just one or two nation states. Even Eastern Europe and Scandinavia are buckiling under the excesses of relentless immigration and exponential non-native birth rates. Europe must become a singular power in order to defend and save itself from forces. European Identity and Culture inextricably go hand in hand.

Atsuria and Neu tyrol

Post self-deleted by Atsuria.

Post self-deleted by Atsuria.

Post self-deleted by Atsuria.

Brekekk wrote:The revolutionary-nationalism inherent in Fascism (a la 1922) was to forge an industrialised and modern nation (ie Italy) in order to compete with other industrialised and modern nations (ie Great Britain and France). As it is we (in 2016) inhabit a post- industrial and post-modern world, in which globalization (Americanism) informs our economics, poltics and mass-culture.
The European Union, in its current form, is a manifestation of this globalization and a power bloc of the US hegemony. As it is, any nationalist endeavour within the major US client states of Western Europe will be hard pushed to extricate itself from this Americanism in particular as the US presents itself as being against the virulent Islamism that threatens Europe but also as a counter to the homegrown Cultural Marxism that infects the European psyche and intellect.
The whole of Europe is under threat from internal and external forces, not just one or two nation states. Even Eastern Europe and Scandinavia are buckiling under the excesses of relentless immigration and exponential non-native birth rates. Europe must become a singular power in order to defend and save itself from forces. European Identity and Culture inextricably go hand in hand.

Hmm, so you don't have anything against nationalism, but you believe that in contemporary times it's hard to accomplish without a larger empire to help it mold ?

Again, I don't think that's necessary.
With enough good, hard and stubborn work, education and such, Americanism can be purged from European nations allowing them to focus more on their own nationalism.

But then, again even that would be hard. Americanism has penetrated nearly if not all levels of society, at least in the middle Europe, so achieving a fascist state, which one requisite for cleansing Americanism, can be hard to achieve.

Individualism sits in our world like the plaque during Middle-ages, American consumeratism increases this, making us their own little chess pieces.

I agree that Europe is facing hard times, especially in the central parts. However, as per nationalist ideals, I have nothing against refugees coming to our countries as long as they are willing to work, to respect the laws and traditions and that they integrate fully.

I used to have a good friend who was from middle-east, he was a good fellow, very honest and law-abiding, in his homeland he was a highly trained engineer, when he got to Finland he took whatever trash jobs available, in order to do his part.
Then again, why does Finland for example, take in refugees, when in the current bad economic situation (thanks to corrupt EU, politicians and bankers) is bad enough that there are job problems already for native residents ? What's the good of having hard-working immigrants, when they can't get a job. Whether bc there are no jobs available or the employee is racist enough not to give it.

I don't believe that a European empire is necessary, strong national states+strong diplomatic bonds will suffice, but I agree that an empire of sorts could be formed from central European nations in order to better handle the situation.

Brekekk and Neu tyrol

Atsuria wrote:Hmm, so you don't have anything against nationalism, but you believe that in contemporary times it's hard to accomplish without a larger empire to help it mold ?
Again, I don't think that's necessary.
With enough good, hard and stubborn work, education and such, Americanism can be purged from European nations allowing them to focus more on their own nationalism.
But then, again even that would be hard. Americanism has penetrated nearly if not all levels of society, at least in the middle Europe, so achieving a fascist state, which one requisite for cleansing Americanism, can be hard to achieve.
Individualism sits in our world like the plaque during Middle-ages, American consumeratism increases this, making us their own little chess pieces.
I agree that Europe is facing hard times, especially in the central parts. However, as per nationalist ideals, I have nothing against refugees coming to our countries as long as they are willing to work, to respect the laws and traditions and that they integrate fully.
I used to have a good friend who was from middle-east, he was a good fellow, very honest and law-abiding, in his homeland he was a highly trained engineer, when he got to Finland he took whatever trash jobs available, in order to do his part.
Then again, why does Finland for example, take in refugees, when in the current bad economic situation (thanks to corrupt EU, politicians and bankers) is bad enough that there are job problems already for native residents ? What's the good of having hard-working immigrants, when they can't get a job. Whether bc there are no jobs available or the employee is racist enough not to give it.
I don't believe that a European empire is necessary, strong national states+strong diplomatic bonds will suffice, but I agree that an empire of sorts could be formed from central European nations in order to better handle the situation.

My problem with nationalism is that it's too limited in scope for our times. Without it being a part of the wider struggle then it's virtually useless. Also nationalist politics tend to be very confrontational in style, veering off into neonazi subculture without the depth and intelligence to think for itself in relation to liberalism and Marxism.

And in relation to mass immigration, I find it difficult to understand how it essentially boils down into purely economic terms. Immigrants = good when they're willing to work. Of course they are. That's why the EU is so keen to get as many as possible in to bolster depleted native European worker stock. Europe has a decreasing birth rate and increasing retiring population. It needs a ready source of cheap and willing labour ready to work uncontracted hours for no pension plan. Bolster up this surplus stock with a benefit system that is still far above the living wage of their countries of origin and everybody's happy.

Unfortunately though, Europe's problems aren't confined to a materialistic level. Migrants bring with them a culture that in most cases is antithetical to that of Europe's. Obviously I realise that migration has always existed however never on this scale and it isn't just singular nation states that are affected. Go to any major Western city; London, Paris, Milan. It's the same cultures that are building their nests in each city.

Atsuria and Neu tyrol

Please approve my resolution to Repeal SC # 195, I can rewrite it if needed. Please approve, everyone! page=UN_view_proposal/id=neu_tyrol_1464225588

Atsuria and Brekekk

Brekekk wrote:

Unfortunately though, Europe's problems aren't confined to a materialistic level. Migrants bring with them a culture that in most cases is antithetical to that of Europe's. Obviously I realise that migration has always existed however never on this scale and it isn't just singular nation states that are affected. Go to any major Western city; London, Paris, Milan. It's the same cultures that are building their nests in each city.

Agreed, I really hate seeing migrants fighting over some irrelevant things, whether they're doing it with each others or with natives.

Some migrants keep complaining and attacking women bc they don't wear the mandatory robes of Islam.

If you're willing to migrate, then you must be willing to integrate and merge with the new culture.

Preliator ~ Rome

https://youtube.com/watch?v=oA4PnGGLkfU

P0rtvgal and Atsuria

Atsuria wrote:Agreed, I really hate seeing migrants fighting over some irrelevant things, whether they're doing it with each others or with natives.
Some migrants keep complaining and attacking women bc they don't wear the mandatory robes of Islam.
If you're willing to migrate, then you must be willing to integrate and merge with the new culture.

Cultures don't always mix and integrate so easily.

Boyd Rice ~ History Lesson

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Oxg09Xxc42U

Post self-deleted by Atsuria.

Brekekk wrote:Preliator ~ Rome
https://youtube.com/watch?v=oA4PnGGLkfU

Nice one ! But surely rome was more than just military tactics and bloodshed ?

People always seem to remember rome only from it's efficient expansion, military organization and tactics.
Sure it's true and should be looked upon but rome did have other htings to it too, even though most of it was only copied from older civilizations.

science, medicine and the arts flourished, very sad that as soon as the dark times hit, it all went back a great leap.
We would be so much more advanced already, if the church hadn't tried to hinder progress.

Don't get me wrong, I'm religious but the church made *some" bad things in the past.

Corrupt popes and priests, sexually using women under the pretense of "purging the sins".
Chruch using power through fear controlling citizens lives in a time when what they saw, they though was real.

Hell and purgatory were painted in the church's walls, thus they were real.

more into the subject :http://listverse.com/2011/06/08/top-10-shameful-moments-in-catholic-history/

WE'VE A TRAITOR IN OUR MIDST!

Osirisa Has voted FOR "Liberate Arab Leauge"! This is a BLATANT violation of all of our ideals, our efforts and our allies efforts. This is a disgrace, and Osirisa Must reverse their vote or pay for their actions!

Neu tyrol wrote:WE'VE A TRAITOR IN OUR MIDST!
Osirisa Has voted FOR "Liberate Arab Leauge"! This is a BLATANT violation of all of our ideals, our efforts and our allies efforts. This is a disgrace, and Osirisa Must reverse their vote or pay for their actions!

I will talk with him, Osirisa will Either correct his actions or face punishment for Treason.

The arab leaque has been taken in by Forces of NE, While we don't as per neutrality policy support them directly, any operation done against antifa is a move towards the better.

Everyone must vote against the liberation.

Neu tyrol

Atsuria, why you got to make this pole so hard. My two favorite eras are not in one category! Expansion and Imperialism and early modern age.

Atsuria and Neu tyrol

Xozanero wrote:Atsuria, why you got to make this pole so hard. My two favorite eras are not in one category! Expansion and Imperialism and early modern age.

oh, I make the pole hard XD ?

Good to know that I can still impress

Neu tyrol

Atsuria wrote:Nice one ! But surely rome was more than just military tactics and bloodshed ?
People always seem to remember rome only from it's efficient expansion, military organization and tactics.
Sure it's true and should be looked upon but rome did have other htings to it too, even though most of it was only copied from older civilizations.
science, medicine and the arts flourished, very sad that as soon as the dark times hit, it all went back a great leap.
We would be so much more advanced already, if the church hadn't tried to hinder progress.
Don't get me wrong, I'm religious but the church made *some" bad things in the past.
Corrupt popes and priests, sexually using women under the pretense of "purging the sins".
Chruch using power through fear controlling citizens lives in a time when what they saw, they though was real.
Hell and purgatory were painted in the church's walls, thus they were real.
more into the subject :http://listverse.com/2011/06/08/top-10-shameful-moments-in-catholic-history/

Good point unfortunately watching somebody build a viaduct isn't that interesting for a martial ambient track.

Also I'm more of a pagan myself so it's probably not a good idea for me to get involved in the whole Christianity debate.

The Commonwealth of G30rgia has been founded by order of Knig Reinhard I of Neu Tyrol, as G30rgia is the newest expansion of Tyrolean rule overseas. Gott Mitt Uns!

P0rtvgal and Brekekk

Regional Happenings
11 hours ago: Haritopia ceased to exist.

Roman Salute.

P0rtvgal, Atsuria, and Neu tyrol

R I P
Gone too soon!

And apparently I missed a very big development in external relations...
It all turned out for the best I suppose?

Atsuria and Brekekk

" Neu Tyrol (elected 77 days ago)"

Friendly reminder we re-appoint at day 87, ending the poll on day 90.

Atsuria and Neu tyrol

P0rtvgal wrote:R I P
Gone too soon!
And apparently I missed a very big development in external relations...
It all turned out for the best I suppose?

As well as could be expected.

In other news:

Ginger Jihadists

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/09/09/ginger-jihadis-why-redheads-are-attracted-to-radical-islam/

Social "Dysorganization"

http://alternative-right.blogspot.co.ke/2016/06/social-dysorganization-and-malthusian.html?m=1

Oswald Spengler and Cęserism

http://euro-synergies.hautetfort.com/archive/2016/05/30/oswald-spengler-the-controversy-of-caesarism.html

The Relevance of the "Old Right"

http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/06/the-relevance-of-the-old-right/#more-63308

P0rtvgal wrote:" Neu Tyrol (elected 77 days ago)"
Friendly reminder we re-appoint at day 87, ending the poll on day 90.

I won't be here for the election, as I will be gone from the 5th to the 19th. Could you possibly postpone it so I can have somewhat of a say?

«12. . .237238239240241242243. . .1,0831,084»

Advertisement