by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .853854855856857858859. . .27,76327,764»

Post by 1234567890- suppressed by a moderator.

Post self-deleted by Outer Sparta.

On my notices page, why does it say that nations #1049164, #989552, and #764912 liked my RMB posts? Are they nations that were deleted by a mod?

The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, Great British Federation, and 1 otherEast india corporatocracy

Outer Sparta wrote:On my notices page, why does it say that nations #1049164, #989552, and #764912 liked my RMB posts? Are they nations that were deleted by a mod?

Most likely Howard's, but yes, they are deleted nations.

Outer Sparta, The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, and 2 othersGreat British Federation, and East india corporatocracy

Post self-deleted by Quantum instability.

Quantum instability

Outer Sparta wrote:On my notices page, why does it say that nations #1049164, #989552, and #764912 liked my RMB posts? Are they nations that were deleted by a mod?

I got a similar thing; I think two of them were nations called "I am a maoist" and "1234567890" - I figure some dark and dastardly plot was afoot while I slept, but it's a good thing the moderators don't sleep...

Outer Sparta, The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Great British Federation, and 1 otherEast india corporatocracy

Who is this Short shortsism-first worldism? Does Short shorts know about this? Is it a puppet of his, or some sycophantic imposter that's up to something?
- No offence meant, but this is confusing!

Ecclestia, East india corporatocracy, and Short shortsism-first worldism

Dude, please leave us in peace.

Moderators, Delegate, Eurofounder can't we get rid of this guy?! He must be doing something against the rules surely?! (eg. Impersonation of another Nation for malicious intent perhaps?)- Must be worth a suppression, banjection, a boot, kick, paddle, or public flogging with a flail or something?!

...He's bloody annoying!

East india corporatocracy

Wait, is Howard back? Has he made any videos?

Melfar, The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, and 2 othersGreat British Federation, and East india corporatocracy

Foucaults garden

Not yet. I'm waiting though. It is very disrespectful from Howie to mention only Tigs, Shorts and Nukls. As if they were the olny a$$holes round here..

The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, Great British Federation, and 1 otherEast india corporatocracy

He remembers me as well, Foucault; it must be that you're just a very forgettable a$$hole.

The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, Great British Federation, and 1 otherEast india corporatocracy

Who's this "Howard" fellow? Did I miss something?

The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Great British Federation, and East india corporatocracy

I can't even go to work without you kids letting strangers in the house...

Melfar, Ecclestia, The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, and 4 othersQuantum instability, Great British Federation, Tuccistahn, and East india corporatocracy

Gibraltar chorizo

Hello! Im the leader of Gibraltar Chorizo!!! Hahahah, not Spain or England anymore. Long life to the gibraltarchorizean Regime.

I can't vote for either side as both have too many flaws.

Jenesia wrote:I can't even go to work without you kids letting strangers in the house...

We didn't let him in. The chain on the padlock is broken.

The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, Great British Federation, and 1 otherEast india corporatocracy

Tsykaland wrote:I can't vote for either side as both have too many flaws.

Vote for what?

Melfar wrote:We didn't let him in. The chain on the padlock is broken.

It certainly isn't like we're going to password Europe is it?

Dark Matter, The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, and 2 othersGreat British Federation, and East india corporatocracy

Post self-deleted by Tsykaland.

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Vote for what?

It certainly isn't like we're going to password Europe is it?

Vote for/against the current resolution, I mean.

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Vote for what?

It certainly isn't like we're going to password Europe is it?

Why a password, then? Or we'll be targeted for a liberation, perhaps?

The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, Great British Federation, and 1 otherEast india corporatocracy

Pass sword, stab keggunt.

Melfar, The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, and 2 othersGreat British Federation, and East india corporatocracy

Liberation? From what? No, we won't be password protecting Europe. We want people to join our region.

The Dark Norse, The damned achaemenid, Quantum instability, Great British Federation, and 1 otherEast india corporatocracy

Nukls-Andwicz wrote:Pass sword, stab keggunt.

Umm... translation, please?

I have changed my mind and have put forward points below why we should vote against the repeal...

"Noting that the target Resolution was drafted in an attempt to promote space travel by Member States"
--And quite rightly so--

"Recognizing that the Resolution not only fails in this goal, but also harms existing space programs of Member States"
--I understand that this is supposedly detailed below--

"Objecting to the Resolution's claim that Member Nations need cooperate in order to explore space, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary"
-- That's odd, I don't see any evidence provided. Stop using weasel words and come up with the evidence. --

"Concerned that with the inclusion of clauses that give the W.S.A authority to regulate the Interstellar and Interplanetary exploration of Member States, the Resolution cripples the ability of Member States to conduct their own Space Programmes"
-- In no way does the previous resolution have this effect, nor is there any quotation I could find within the original resolution giving way to this. --

"Further Concerned that while the Resolution authorizes the W.S.A to regulate the Space Programmes of Member States, it fails to specify any regulations"
-- Actually, the resolution is "DEMANDING member states to enact safety regulations for space travel within their governed territory.". Thus is only demanding that Member States think upon themselves what they believe to be suitable regulations - not enforcing any put forward by the WSA. --

"Extremely Confused by the Resolution's use of "Preformed", which makes many of the goals stated within the resolution impossible"
-- The meaning behind this being that if any of these statements have been formed beforehand, then the resolution applies to them. --

"Noting that the Resolution demands that Member States disallow the use of vessels in a state of disrepair, without exception regarding vessels damaged in space or other unavoidable circumstances"
-- Of course this is important. We should always discontinue dangerous vessels that cannot be repaired. --

"Further noting that the target Resolution contains numerous grammatical errors, which hinder comprehension of the Resolution"
-- 'Tis the spirit of the law which shall be pursued, not the letter of the law' - Unknown. --

«12. . .853854855856857858859. . .27,76327,764»

Advertisement