CatholicBoard

Status ecclesiae wrote:

Edited for our pedantic brothers and sisters.

This is a step in the right direction. Now, at the risk of seeming nitpicky, I would tweak the structure of the text, for its organisation leaves some room for improvement. What I have in mind is that the introductory section is assigned a number just like main sections, which is not the most fortunate choice. How about starting the numbering from section two, i.e. the statement regarding what Status Ecclesiae actually does? Moreover, when I mentioned inconsistent punctuation, I had a slightly different solution in mind. Full stops at the end of each section do not make much sense, not to put too fine a point on it. Should you replace all of them but the ultimate one with semicolons, your text will benefit significantly; the way it is now, it has subordinate clauses acting as if they were sentences, which, in my humble opinion, is ungrammatical.

Hello, You might know i am the second counselor of PLI military league starting now, we will now accept joint missions.

Welcome to the region! Peace and Good!

SECOND WARNING:

The Gothic Subculture will someday rule the church as a majority!

Great lorielensburgia wrote:

The Gothic Subculture will someday rule the church as a majority!

Definitely not. Unless you are talking about Gothic architecture.

The masses empire wrote:

Yes, and women will become priest because the church is the most sexist thing on the planet at the time and a women can do everything a man should.
<sarcasm>

THE CHURCH IS NOT FEMINISM, YOU WHITE WASHED WALL!

Frustrated Franciscans wrote:

Definitely not. Unless you are talking about Gothic architecture.

If you affiliate yourselves with the website GOD HATES GOTHS you will see in your eyes Gothic people drenched in sorrow and blackness

United Territories of Central Aldmerrow wrote:

Don't even know what the Gothic subculture is, but I agree with the Franciscans

Have you ever heard of Gothic rock bands?

Great lorielensburgia wrote:

THE CHURCH IS NOT FEMINISM, YOU WHITE WASHED WALL!

What is "FEMINISM?" That's not a rhetorical question. History is rife with abuses of the language. Groups steal terms all of the time. Now the official definition is, "the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men." That's a pretty slippery slope right there because "rights" are often the opposite side of the coin from traditional Catholic arguments. But in terms of "politics" (another word abused to death), in terms of "economics" and in terms of "society" I believe that the notion that God made them male and female is a good indication that while men and women are different and have vastly different roles to play that in God's eyes they are equal in importance. That's why, for example, when Jesus rose from the dead, he first announced himself to WOMEN. Mary Magdalene is known as the "Apostle to the Apostles" or "one who was sent to the ones who were sent."

Of course, Goth culture is not "feminism" but rather gender neutrality. It is a denial of the wonderful differences between man and woman which God had made. I can think of another example, the women are tragic flappers and the men are just tragic; the logical conclusion of godless libertarianism.

It's can only be a good thing when a national leader comes out against population control and birth control.
But why does it have to be Erdogan?
https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/no-muslim-family-engage-birth-control-erdogan/

I will be leaving soon due to my designation as a teacher in real life. I will also create a region for my students. Thank you for accommodating me here.

Frustrated Franciscans wrote:

What is "FEMINISM?" That's not a rhetorical question. History is rife with abuses of the language. Groups steal terms all of the time. Now the official definition is, "the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men." That's a pretty slippery slope right there because "rights" are often the opposite side of the coin from traditional Catholic arguments. But in terms of "politics" (another word abused to death), in terms of "economics" and in terms of "society" I believe that the notion that God made them male and female is a good indication that while men and women are different and have vastly different roles to play that in God's eyes they are equal in importance. That's why, for example, when Jesus rose from the dead, he first announced himself to WOMEN. Mary Magdalene is known as the "Apostle to the Apostles" or "one who was sent to the ones who were sent."
Of course, Goth culture is not "feminism" but rather gender neutrality. It is a denial of the wonderful differences between man and woman which God had made. I can think of another example, the women are tragic flappers and the men are just tragic; the logical conclusion of godless libertarianism.

I WILL PREVENT ANYONE WHO CAN STRIVE TO IMPLEMENT WOMEN'S SUPREMACY OVER THE WORLD!

Sure, I guess. (Bring out the R.C.I.A.)