Laissez Faireholm RMB

WA Delegate: The Motors of Lincoln Sydney (elected )

Founder: Distruzio

BoardActivity History Admin

World Factbook Entry

Welcome! This is a region conceived for the libertarian minded - the belief that liberty is the primary virtue of humanity and that the State should be minimized to the greatest possible extent.

Anyone who believes in individual free will is welcome. Here you'll find the cure for stateholm syndrome.

Please endorse our regional WA Delegate, The Motors of Lincoln Sydney

Liberty is not a means to a political end. It is itself the highest political end.
- Lord Acton

The ideal Government of all reflective men, from Aristotle onward, is one which lets the individual alone – one which barely escapes being no government at all.
- H.L. Mencken

LinkClick here to go to our offsite forums

Embassies: Libertatem, Black Mesa Islands, Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region, Eastern Roman Empire, Hellenic Civilization, Snopesean Archipelago, Weed, Eutopia, One big Island, The National Alliance, Maltropian Puppet Confederacy, Persian Tricycle Riders, Capitalist Paradise, Cashnatchee, World Alliance, The Alliance Pocket Universe, and 65 others.New Europe, Zarathustra, North Africa, International Republican Union, The Commonwealth Of Furry Peoples, United Empire of Islam, League of Christian Nations, Confederation of Nations, Strategos Prime, Zentari, League of Cobalt Nations, Arctic, The Western Empire, Gay, Isles of Socialism, The Illuminati, Ivory Tower, Antista, The Hyatt Islands, Northern Emirates, The Seventh Bay, The Versutian Federation, Fusionism, Austritaria, Paraguay, International Commonwealth Of Nations, The Liberty Sector, Transhuman Singularity Research Alliance, Oceanside, Deutschland, Ankh Mauta, Anarcho Pragmatism, The Evil Genius Archipelago, Anarchy, The Atlas Union, European Region, League of Nations, Classical Liberal Union, New Vatican, The Atheist Empire, Continent of Xenonia, The International Commerce Guild, Avadam Inn, Federation of Free States, The Waters of Lethe, Dill Country, The New Axis Powers, Mont Pelerin Society, Democratic Egalitarianism, New Republica, The Utopian Freesocialists, Creative Nothing, The Christian Nations, Turkic Union, Iura Pecunia et libertas, Coalition of Nightwatchman States, Land of Absolute Freedom, Antas, Liberland, Imperial Russian Empire, Mphela, The Stupid Region, The Libertarian Treehouse Club, GANGIP, and U R N.

The embassy with New Republica is being withdrawn. Closure expected .

Tags: Anti-Fascist, National Sovereigntist, Offsite Forums, General Assembly, Anarchist, Industrial, Monarchist, Independent, Featured, Password, Conservative, Liberal, and 14 others.Libertarian, Medium, Regional Government, Democratic, Capitalist, Social, Generalite, Free Trade, Isolationist, Role Player, Founderless, Anti-Communist, Serious, and World Assembly.

Regional Power: Moderate

Laissez Faireholm contains 43 nations, the 268th most in the world.

Password required

Today's World Census Report

The Most World Assembly Endorsements in Laissez Faireholm

World Census staff pored through World Assembly records to determine which nations were the most endorsed by others in their region.

As a region, Laissez Faireholm is ranked 210th in the world for Most World Assembly Endorsements.

#NationWA CategoryMotto
41.The Empire of M16A1Anarchy“We're just killing time until the world ends.”
42.The Confederacy of Neu RilkaLeft-Leaning College State“Freiheit über den Tod”
43.The Pevvania of Cosmo KramerCapitalist Paradise“Giddyup!”
Page:  «  1  2  3  4  5  »

Regional Happenings

More...

Laissez Faireholm Regional Message Board

The Free Confederacy of Vecherd wrote:Nah. I highly doubt I will vote for them next election. They are warmongerers and very close minded, and in general all their politician are young angry/arrogant men thinking Ayn Rand is some kind of prophet.

That's unfortunate. I looked at their website and they look very progressive, supporting free movement of labour, social tolerance and a non-interventionist foreign policy.

The Pevvania of Cosmo Kramer wrote:That's unfortunate. I looked at their website and they look very progressive, supporting free movement of labour, social tolerance and a non-interventionist foreign policy.


Yeah well.. I was able to stay in their internal party forum on Facebook for quite some time. It's infested with racism towards muslims and neoconservatives. And even in public the leader supports nuking Iran. They are strict adherents of ARI objectivism and they write nice things on their page but that's as far as it goes. This party was basically started because their former party was so looked down up that they needed to rebrand.

Their official name in English is The Capitalist Party, because they view libertarianism as morally wrong.

Cosmo Kramer and The Liberated Territories

The Free Confederacy of Vecherd wrote:Yeah well.. I was able to stay in their internal party forum on Facebook for quite some time. It's infested with racism towards muslims and neoconservatives. And even in public the leader supports nuking Iran. They are strict adherents of ARI objectivism and they write nice things on their page but that's as far as it goes. This party was basically started because their former party was so looked down up that they needed to rebrand.

Their official name in English is The Capitalist Party, because they view libertarianism as morally wrong.

What a shame. Sounds like how UKIP were calling themselves a 'libertarian' party for a while.

The Pevvania of Cosmo Kramer wrote:What a shame. Sounds like how UKIP were calling themselves a 'libertarian' party for a while.


Yeah pretty much. Dont get me wrong they have some great policies, and are very radical. The problem is that some of that radicalism is taken in the wrong direction on many points. And I would rather vote for a moderately libertarian party that are better across the board on everything, than a party that are very good on certain points, and terrible at other points. Because we know that the areas where they want to implement more state power and spending(military 100% increase, and police 50% increase) are the easiest thing for them to get done.

The Liberated Territories

The Free Confederacy of Vecherd wrote:Yeah well.. I was able to stay in their internal party forum on Facebook for quite some time. It's infested with racism towards muslims and neoconservatives. And even in public the leader supports nuking Iran. They are strict adherents of ARI objectivism and they write nice things on their page but that's as far as it goes. This party was basically started because their former party was so looked down up that they needed to rebrand.

Their official name in English is The Capitalist Party, because they view libertarianism as morally wrong.


From the information I could gather up, the former party Liberal People's Party was originally a social liberal party that attempted to revive a party that existed in the past, however it was "taken over" by a group of objectivists and former Progressive Party members. I guess then they got a bad rap somewhere along the way and then tried rebranding themselves, although if you are "taking over" parties because you can't get your own off the ground, I don't think you deserve sympathy.

Although it is worth pointing out that they were apart of the new International Alliance of Libertarian Parties (AILP) and Interlibertarians and supported the efforts created by the Czech libertarians in the creation of Liberland. Why a bunch of objectivists would do this is beyond me, if they are principled enough not to label themselves as libertarian yet align with libertarian parties...?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_People%27s_Party_(Norway,_1972)
http://www.ialp.com/?page_id=290

The Confederation of The Liberated Territories wrote:From the information I could gather up, the former party Liberal People's Party was originally a social liberal party that attempted to revive a party that existed in the past, however it was "taken over" by a group of objectivists and former Progressive Party members. I guess then they got a bad rap somewhere along the way and then tried rebranding themselves, although if you are "taking over" parties because you can't get your own off the ground, I don't think you deserve sympathy.

Although it is worth pointing out that they were apart of the new International Alliance of Libertarian Parties (AILP) and Interlibertarians and supported the efforts created by the Czech libertarians in the creation of Liberland. Why a bunch of objectivists would do this is beyond me, if they are principled enough not to label themselves as libertarian yet align with libertarian parties...?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_People%27s_Party_(Norway,_1972)
http://www.ialp.com/?page_id=290


Yeah, the liberal peoples party split from the Liberal Party on the issue of joining the EU. By the 90s almost all the people in DLF had rejoined the Liberal Party and a professor took over the party in 2001ish and it turned more or less Objectivist, then some national conservatives tried to take it over from the Objectivists but failed. After that its been more of a objectivist think tank really, but standing for election in some counties(MPs are elected at county level). So since 2001 it has gotten around 100-900 votes every election, not really a lot. Yeah some Progress Party members have made a move from their party(FrP) to DLF, but most of the libertarians in FrP only talked about it, because they viewed DLF as wackjobs(and FrP is considered the wackjob party in national politics so that says a lot..). So 'Liberalistene'(literally in English would be 'The Libertarians') was founded by former members to make them seem not as crazy, but they kept roughly 95-99% of the party program, but without such a harsh way of wording themselves and more young people. They have been a bit more successful in gaining FrP supporters but in general same sh!t. Liberalistene does not bar AnCap members actually, although they bar religious people. So a tiny bit of liberalization of their party.

They have tried to branch out in the world, which is very hard considering there are very few objectivist parties in the world.(I can only think of the Objectivist Party USA and The LibertariaNZ in New Zealand). But yeah, they dislike libertarians yet have an uncomfortable alliance with Libertarian parties abroad.

Actually the United States has the weaponry to destroy the Iranian nuclear development bases (one does not bury civilian nuclear power stations deep underground or in the sides of mountains) WITHOUT using nuclear weapons.

I doubt that Israel has that ability. A nuclear attack may be its only option.

So if you do NOT want Iran nuked - then you will support American action.

However, if you are sincere noninterventionist......

You are at liberty to say - "Israel may nuke these Iranian development bases if its people favour such an action - it is nothing to do with us".

Of course no sincere noninterventionist will oppose any Israeli action - as "it has nothing to do with us" means just that.

This does leave aside the "little" problem that Iranian "Hasteners" (the regime NOT the people of Iran) do not "just" wish to destroy Israel.

For the "Hidden One" to return (on his white horse) far more than "just" six million Jews must be destroyed.

A private "Protection Agency" would not sit about till a "Hastener" nuclear bomb explodes in New York harbour.

Why should a government just sit about making absurd "this is not a treaty it is a deal" agreements with "Hasteners" who have no intention of keeping an agreement with the "Great Satan" (or any non "Hastener" - even fellow Muslims).

These are the alternatives.

Strike (as American can) with conventional weapons.

Or stand aside "it has nothing to do with us".

But if you choose the second option - do not complain if others attack with whatever weapons they must use.

By the way - if anyone calls out "end American government aid to Israel".

I actually agree with you.

I believe government aid to be corrupting - harming those it is supposed to help.

Elwher

page=dispatch/id=360109

Updated. Now with links!

Vecherd

As much as I dislike the ACT Party, I do kind of like David Seymour, as he (surprisingly) supports taking more UN refugees and did good work on euthanasia. Better than those clowns Jamie Whyte/Rodney Hide.

The Confederation of The Liberated Territories wrote:page=dispatch/id=360109

Updated. Now with links!


Oh, that's cool!

Might I come with two suggestions though? There is a libertarian party in Ukraine, called 5.10(they want to change the tax system so that the only taxes are 5% sales tax and 10% payroll tax, hence the party name). And are quite strong on gun rights and property rights as well. Lots of libertarian ideas on their page as well. Seems to be generally a austrian economics aligned party and as such not that much mention of social freddom, but I guess that is common in 'poor' countries, economic freedom comes first, then social freedom. http://510.ua/about/program/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.10

Israel - Likud has some interesting characters(Feiglin), but generally your average Liberal Conservative party put in a warzone. I would suggest Ale Yarok, it started as a cannabis legalization party, but has broadened and is now classical liberal, free markets, pro-peace and secularism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ale_Yarok http://www.aleyarok.org.il/

This one might be interesting as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Movement_(Costa_Rica)

Forum View

by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics