WA Delegate: The Motors of Lincoln Sydney (elected 236 days ago)
Founder: The Federated Realms of Distruzio
Embassies: Galts Gulch, Black Mesa Islands, Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region, Libertatem, Anarchist Alliance, Eastern Roman Empire, Antifa, Hellenic Civilization, Snopesean Archipelago, Weed, Democrats, Eutopia, One big Island, the Land of Power, The Allied Republics, The National Alliance, and 75 others.Maltropian Puppet Confederacy, Persian Tricycle Riders, United Dictatorships, Capitalist Paradise, Cashnatchee, World Alliance, The Alliance Pocket Universe, New Republica, New Europe, Polandia, Zarathustra, Federation of Free States, North Africa, International Republican Union, The Commonwealth Of Furry Peoples, The True Rebirth, United Empire of Islam, Glorious Nations of Iwaku, League of Christian Nations, the council of free nations, NationStates Sesquipedalian Countries, Confederation of Nations, Strategos Prime, Atheist Empire, Liberty Galaxy, The Darwin Allied Republics, Zentari, Phloibia, The Burning Aisles, United Republic of Liberty, League of Cobalt Nations, The National Conglomerate, Arctic, The Western Empire, Gay, The Statue of Liberty, Territory of Imaginary Numbers, Trainsylvinea, Isles of Socialism, The Federal Islands 2nd Gen, The Illuminati, Ivory Tower, Libertarians, The Land of the Most Compitent, Antista, The Hyatt Islands, Land of Absolute Freedom, Northern Emirates, The Seventh Bay, The Versutian Federation, United Nations in Solidarity, Fusionism, The Legion of Titans, The UN of NationStates, Austritaria, Ministreyl Union, Paraguay, International Commonwealth Of Nations, Alliance of Capitalist Republics, The Liberty Sector, Transhuman Singularity Research Alliance, Oceanside, The Inherent Contradiction, Brannack, The Taldrenite Haven, Glenda Dawson HighSchool, Threedom, Deutschland, Ankh Mauta, Intergalactic Corporate Empire, Seafieldia, The Outer Rim, Erebos, Anarcho Pragmatism, and Republica Federativa do Brasil.
Tags: Anti-Fascist, National Sovereigntist, Offsite Forums, General Assembly, Anarchist, Industrial, Monarchist, Independent, Featured, Conservative, Liberal, Libertarian, and 12 others.Regional Government, Democratic, Capitalist, Social, Generalite, Large, Free Trade, Isolationist, Role Player, Anti-Communist, Serious, and World Assembly.
Regional Power: High
Today's World Census Report
The Greatest Rich-Poor Divides in Laissez Faireholm
Nations ranked highly have large gaps between the incomes of rich and poor citizens. Nations low on the list have high levels of income equality.
As a region, Laissez Faireholm is ranked 2,650th in the world for Greatest Rich-Poor Divides.
|31.||The United Democratic Republics of Mourtzouphlos||Capitalist Paradise||“Sona si Latine loqueris”|
|32.||The Robert Nozick of Arkolon||Anarchy||“Anarchy, State, and Arkolon”|
|33.||The Rogue Nation of Travisikstan||Capitalizt||“I will punch you in the face. Leave me alone.”|
|34.||The Rogue Nation of Nortel Vest Bd9538land||Capitalizt||“We want pie!”|
|35.||The Free Confederacy of Vecherd||Anarchy||“Sic semper evello mortem Tyrannis”|
|36.||The Free Land of Nektonay||Anarchy||“We demand pizza”|
|37.||The Federated States of Amacia||Capitalist Paradise||“By God and Steel”|
|38.||The Republic of Freiheit Reich||Capitalist Paradise||“Prosperity through rewarding ability and reason”|
|39.||The Confederacy of John Birch Society||Compulsory Consumerist State||“Dont Tread On Me”|
|40.||The ✌oluntaryist Republic of Agorapolis||Inoffensive Centrist Democracy||“Vox Libertas!”|
- 9 hours ago: The Free Land of Market Mort ceased to exist.
- 18 hours ago: The Empire of Distruzionopolis arrived from The East Pacific.
- 22 hours ago: The Protectorate of Rangaroke arrived from Balder.
- 1 day 21 hours ago: Embassy cancelled between The Remnants of the Mian Empire and Laissez Faireholm.
- 2 days 1 hour ago: The Slavic Queendom of Arisinga departed this region for Glorious Nations of Iwaku.
- 2 days 9 hours ago: Embassy cancelled between Pacific Union and Laissez Faireholm.
- 2 days 15 hours ago: The Kingdom of Norige arrived from Hemithea.
- 3 days 6 hours ago: The Disputed Territories of Freed North arrived from The West Pacific.
- 3 days 12 hours ago: The Free Land of Freewald arrived from The Hyatt Islands.
- 3 days 22 hours ago: The Judicatorate of Mega-City 01 arrived from Balder.
Laissez Faireholm Regional Message Board
I assume this is satire.
I don't quite follow your baby example. Would you mind restating it? As to the first bit, it seems like you are saying you don't like the consequences of the application of the NAP and property rights, supposing this monarch somehow homesteaded and traded for all the land, and so anarcho-capitalism fails. I'm assuming you are some form of consequentialist based on this, but I'm afraid I'm not and don't really find that convincing.
So basically, if we are born on the land of a monarch, like fruits out of the group we automatically belong to him, despite said monarch not mixing his or her labor to "produce us," but through a contract.
It would be roughly equivalent to a private hospital declaring all babies born on it's land it's property.
it's more like if you are born on a monarchs land you can't decide you never agreed to his rules and decide his land is actually yours now.
the farm example or hospital example is there because, imagine you were born there and grew up here but decided you never made a contract with the hospital so they are illegally aggressing you by telling you to follow their rules on their property. it'd be completely absurd.
You are thinking of communism. The libertarian doesn't assume that the land is "his," or anyone's, merely because they disagree with the current ruler. It would be all fine and dandy if the libertarian were to draw up a contract with the government he decided to join and opt in and out at any time (panarchism), or at least have a government who's "social contract" involves merely upholding the self regulating abilities of voluntary institutions that can do the same thing (minarchism). But unfortunately we must coexist with the unfortunate other option, that amongst all laws passed, wars waged, and liberties lost to the gov, we cannot simply be left alone to our own devices without being metaphorically kicked, stabbed, strangled, or strung.
Hey guys, I'm back, For those of you who don't remember me, I don't blame you, I only made one post here, But I'm a friend of Maryginia, and was managing his account over the summer, and decided to make my own nation and bring my nation here. I don't know if you guys care If I post personal stories here, Also I hope you don't mind my being here, I'm not a Libertarian, More of a Goldwater republican, that's a Monarchist. Anyways Today I was with a group of friends, and we were debating Scottish independence, Yes we're American, anyways I support Scottish independence, though I would support the return of a Jacobite King, anyways, a few of my friends are against it, and as we're discussing it, another one of my friends, who's ancestors came from scotland, came in in a kilt, with bagpipes, and playing Scotland the brave, which I found pretty funny.
Not quite. If we are operating under the NAP, this derives from the concept of self-ownership. Only the individual has any legitimate claim on himself. The monarch, again supposing he rightfully owns the land, can impose rules upon people living on his land just as any landlord would, which is not equatable to ownership of said people.
I agree/disagree. I simply don't believe the notion of inalienable property rights. What is right will work and that is the original Piercian pragmatic notion that I subscribe to.
Property rights/etc. Are fungible in the context that they are conducive to overall efficiency. What must be noted is that all "morals" that are considered intrinsic good; benevolence, justice, etc. Are valued by us because of millenia of selection towards a cohesive societal organization that optimizes the health (physical, mental, etc.) Of the constituency.
I'm not familiar with Pierce, unfortunately, and I'd rather not speculate on your views. Would you mind explaining the relevant parts of your subscribed notion before I respond?
So I found this in the Guns or Butter issue:
"Everyone's got it all wrong," says Margaret O, leader of the Tuponia Libertarian Party. "We need the military now to support our economy but we can't let it get out of control. I say we privatise it and divvy it up between several corporations, and make it self-funding... it sounds radical but taxes will drop, the people will be happy, and we get to keep our military strength to show Johnny Foreigner what's what! Everyone wins! As long it's in the corporations' best interests to protect the country though, I suppose..."
Whoever wrote this needs to be fired.