Laissez Faireholm RMB

WA Delegate: The Motors of Lincoln Sydney (elected 271 days ago)

Founder: The Federated Realms of Distruzio

World Factbook Entry

Welcome! This is a region conceived for the libertarian minded - the belief that liberty is the primary virtue of humanity and that the State should be minimized to the greatest possible extent.

Anyone who believes in individual free will is welcome. Here you'll find the cure for stateholm syndrome.

Please endorse our regional WA Delegate, The Motors of Lincoln Sydney

Liberty is not a means to a political end. It is itself the highest political end.
- Lord Acton

The ideal Government of all reflective men, from Aristotle onward, is one which lets the individual alone one which barely escapes being no government at all.
- H.L. Mencken

LinkClick here to go to our offsite forums

Embassies: Galts Gulch, Black Mesa Islands, Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region, Libertatem, Anarchist Alliance, Eastern Roman Empire, Antifa, Hellenic Civilization, Snopesean Archipelago, Weed, Democrats, Eutopia, One big Island, the Land of Power, The Allied Republics, The National Alliance, and 68 others.Maltropian Puppet Confederacy, Persian Tricycle Riders, United Dictatorships, Capitalist Paradise, Cashnatchee, World Alliance, The Alliance Pocket Universe, New Republica, New Europe, Polandia, Zarathustra, Federation of Free States, North Africa, International Republican Union, The Commonwealth Of Furry Peoples, The True Rebirth, United Empire of Islam, Glorious Nations of Iwaku, League of Christian Nations, the council of free nations, NationStates Sesquipedalian Countries, Confederation of Nations, Strategos Prime, Atheist Empire, Liberty Galaxy, The Darwin Allied Republics, Zentari, The Burning Aisles, United Republic of Liberty, League of Cobalt Nations, Arctic, The Western Empire, Gay, The Statue of Liberty, Territory of Imaginary Numbers, Trainsylvinea, Isles of Socialism, The Federal Islands 2nd Gen, The Illuminati, Ivory Tower, Libertarians, The Land of the Most Compitent, Antista, The Hyatt Islands, Land of Absolute Freedom, Northern Emirates, The Seventh Bay, The Versutian Federation, United Nations in Solidarity, Fusionism, Austritaria, Ministreyl Union, Paraguay, International Commonwealth Of Nations, The Liberty Sector, Transhuman Singularity Research Alliance, Oceanside, The Inherent Contradiction, Brannack, The Taldrenite Haven, Glenda Dawson HighSchool, Threedom, Deutschland, Ankh Mauta, Intergalactic Corporate Empire, The Outer Rim, Anarcho Pragmatism, and Republica Federativa do Brasil.

Tags: Anti-Fascist, National Sovereigntist, Offsite Forums, General Assembly, Anarchist, Industrial, Monarchist, Independent, Featured, Conservative, Liberal, Libertarian, and 12 others.Regional Government, Democratic, Capitalist, Social, Generalite, Large, Free Trade, Isolationist, Role Player, Anti-Communist, Serious, and World Assembly.

Regional Power: High

Laissez Faireholm contains 70 nations, the 159th most in the world.

ActivityHistoryAdministration

Today's World Census Report

The Largest Populations in Laissez Faireholm

The following nations have the greatest number of citizens.

As a region, Laissez Faireholm is ranked 109th in the world for Largest Populations.

#NationWA CategoryMotto
31.The 2nd Reich of Evil the GreatCapitalizt“Gott mit uns”
32.The Stateless Society of New AeriosAnarchy“Lex Veritas Et Libertatem”
33.The Minarchist States of TrezchoixInoffensive Centrist Democracy“Life,Liberty, Pursuit of happiness”
34.The New Freedom Loving Land of Nova Freedom LandWA MemberAnarchy“New land of the brave and free!”
35.The Sovereign Self-Governors of AutarcheonAnarchy“NI DEFENDOS NIAJN RAJTOJN!”
36.The Oppression Loving World of Dead Oppressive WorldPsychotic Dictatorship“World of the cowardly and oppressed!”
37.The Market Square-Society of Magna LiberoAnarchy“Bla Bla Bla”
38.The Federal Republic of The Western LandsWA MemberInoffensive Centrist Democracy“Deeds, Not Words”
39.The Republic of IoannonAnarchy“Libertas Absoluta”
40.The Free Land of Bd9538landAnarchy“Pizza or please leave now”
Page:  «  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  »

Regional Happenings

More...

Laissez Faireholm Regional Message Board

Yes there ares

only you

Oh nose, I hases beens discoveres

Girl!! Gtfo no girls allowed.

But if there is just one girl, then there are no girls. Just girl

which means I'm right

Okay. Incoming sh!tstorm, putting on hazmat suit.

What does everyone think of this article: http://www.johnmccaskey.com/joomla/index.php/blog/71-new-libertarians

I've never been a hardline libertarian myself, and I've typically preferred the rule based consequentialism of Hayek and Friedman to Rand, much less Rothbard. I've justified the NAP, but never on solely natural rights. I've considered myself a (neo)classical liberal in many regards, but I still found the NAP and influences from Austrian economics to be a far stronger argument both morally and economically than anything left of Hayek, as I saw it as an eventual departure from what made Libertarianism justified - the NAP.

That being said, I both agree and disagree with this article. I agree that libertarianism, in order to adapt, should become more consequentalist and able to find good, market based solutions to current problems instead of go back to anarcho-capitalist "privatize errything" mantra. On the other hand, I bemoan what the consequentalism did to neoliberal parties like Germany's Free Democrats, or much more similar, Costa Rica's Libertarian Movement (which is basically liberal conservative now, despite having libertarian origins). If we continue to go down the path of "New" Libertarianism, it'll be the eventual death of Libertarianism and a repudiation of it's ethics. But if the broader Libertarian movement stagnates and doesn't accept anything but an anarcho-capitalist or hardline minarchist defense of itself, it'll never move outside the fringe of politics. Therefore I have become to believe that libertarians should focus on the medium in between those two points, adhering to the NAP, but as a principle and not an axiom, and never dogmatically. And be open to compromise, but not sacrifice individual liberties and non-aggression, or sacrifice the rule of the free market to corruption through utilitarian based intervention, like our liberal friends, and backtrack to statism and it's resulting problems.

Thoughts?

"but not sacrifice individual liberties and non-aggression, or sacrifice the rule of the free market to corruption through utilitarian based intervention, like our liberal friends, and backtrack to statism and it's resulting problems." So you're AnCap then?

I think there are strong consequentialist arguments for market anarchism and moral ones. Just look at David Friedman, consequentialist ancap.

The thing is, how do we know if 'New Libertarianism' isn't the best way? As it has just started out and the AnCap movement is just getting started, but new organizations and people popping up everywhere, people that are into philosophy and politics at the same time often goes to the extreme of their positions anyway. The Free Democrats were never libertarian, but rather classical liberals to some extent at least, but as they are fading away we also see more libertarian parties popping up or gaining ground(SSV - Czech Republic, KNP - Poland, SaS - Slovakia), particularly in Eastern Europe, even getting into the European parliament and the national parliaments. The youth party of the second largest Norwegian party in government, is libertarian too, for example.

The Free Confederacy of Vecherd wrote:"but not sacrifice individual liberties and non-aggression, or sacrifice the rule of the free market to corruption through utilitarian based intervention, like our liberal friends, and backtrack to statism and it's resulting problems." So you're AnCap then?

I think there are strong consequentialist arguments for market anarchism and moral ones. Just look at David Friedman, consequentialist ancap.

The thing is, how do we know if 'New Libertarianism' isn't the best way? As it has just started out and the AnCap movement is just getting started, but new organizations and people popping up everywhere, people that are into philosophy and politics at the same time often goes to the extreme of their positions anyway. The Free Democrats were never libertarian, but rather classical liberals to some extent at least, but as they are fading away we also see more libertarian parties popping up or gaining ground(SSV - Czech Republic, KNP - Poland, SaS - Slovakia), particularly in Eastern Europe, even getting into the European parliament and the national parliaments. The youth party of the second largest Norwegian party in government, is libertarian too, for example.

Because it isn't, it's a "compromise" that seeks to socialize Libertarianism. AnCap movement has been around for fifty years in some form or another. Even more if you consider the nearly anarchistic liberal radicals of the 18th and 19th centuries to Nock. I always thought the FreeDems needed some sort of Ron Paul type character to gain some traction in the party, perhaps bring to light an anti-EU stance and support for hard money that the liberals wouldn't normally support. Basically introduce Austrian economics to a heavily monetarist party. Not only that, but the anti-euro populism could be beneficial for the FDP and leech more liberal voters away from the populist Alternative for Germany, which seems to be gaining traction. Otherwise I agree, I've always noticed that Eastern Europe seems to be a good place to cultivate libertarianism, as many young people seem to be liberal reactionaries against the former Soviet Union and other authoritarian regimes that had once characterized it. Case in point: Ayn Rand

Also, not an Ancap. Rule consequentialist minarchist.

Forum View

by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics