Laissez Faireholm RMB

WA Delegate: The Motors of Lincoln Sydney (elected )

Founder: Distruzio

BoardActivity History Admin

World Factbook Entry

Welcome! This is a region conceived for the libertarian minded - the belief that liberty is the primary virtue of humanity and that the State should be minimized to the greatest possible extent.

Anyone who believes in individual free will is welcome. Here you'll find the cure for stateholm syndrome.

Please endorse our regional WA Delegate, The Motors of Lincoln Sydney

Liberty is not a means to a political end. It is itself the highest political end.
- Lord Acton

The ideal Government of all reflective men, from Aristotle onward, is one which lets the individual alone one which barely escapes being no government at all.
- H.L. Mencken

LinkClick here to go to our offsite forums

Embassies: Libertatem, Black Mesa Islands, Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region, Eastern Roman Empire, Hellenic Civilization, Snopesean Archipelago, Weed, Eutopia, One big Island, The National Alliance, Maltropian Puppet Confederacy, Persian Tricycle Riders, Capitalist Paradise, Cashnatchee, World Alliance, The Alliance Pocket Universe, and 65 others.New Europe, Zarathustra, North Africa, International Republican Union, The Commonwealth Of Furry Peoples, United Empire of Islam, League of Christian Nations, Confederation of Nations, Strategos Prime, Zentari, League of Cobalt Nations, Arctic, The Western Empire, Gay, Isles of Socialism, The Illuminati, Ivory Tower, Antista, The Hyatt Islands, Northern Emirates, The Seventh Bay, The Versutian Federation, Fusionism, Austritaria, Paraguay, International Commonwealth Of Nations, The Liberty Sector, Transhuman Singularity Research Alliance, Oceanside, Deutschland, Ankh Mauta, Anarcho Pragmatism, The Evil Genius Archipelago, Anarchy, The Atlas Union, European Region, League of Nations, Classical Liberal Union, New Vatican, The Atheist Empire, Continent of Xenonia, The International Commerce Guild, Avadam Inn, Federation of Free States, The Waters of Lethe, Dill Country, The New Axis Powers, Mont Pelerin Society, Democratic Egalitarianism, New Republica, The Utopian Freesocialists, Creative Nothing, The Christian Nations, Turkic Union, Iura Pecunia et libertas, Coalition of Nightwatchman States, Land of Absolute Freedom, Antas, Liberland, Imperial Russian Empire, Mphela, The Stupid Region, The Libertarian Treehouse Club, GANGIP, and U R N.

Tags: Anti-Fascist, National Sovereigntist, Offsite Forums, General Assembly, Anarchist, Industrial, Monarchist, Independent, Featured, Password, Conservative, Liberal, and 14 others.Libertarian, Medium, Regional Government, Democratic, Capitalist, Social, Generalite, Free Trade, Isolationist, Role Player, Founderless, Anti-Communist, Serious, and World Assembly.

Regional Power: Moderate

Laissez Faireholm contains 44 nations, the 257th most in the world.

Password required

Today's World Census Report

The Most Pacifist in Laissez Faireholm

Nations ranked highly pursue diplomatic solutions rather than military ones in the international arena, have small or nonexistent militaries, and peace-loving citizens.

As a region, Laissez Faireholm is ranked 15,220th in the world for Most Pacifist.

#NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Ass-puppet of Gendronium PuppetWA MemberAnarchy“The WA-version of Gendronium”
2.The Green Kingdom of FerrianonaWA MemberAuthoritarian Democracy“GABEN”
3.The Republic of Isles ArgentumCivil Rights Lovefest“Citizens United Through Liberty”
4.The Republic of AtlanticatiaWA MemberLeft-wing Utopia“Solidarity among individuals”
5.The Republic of Liberal UtelandAnarchy“Where no man owns another.”
6.The Federation of Asocial partnersAnarchy“Money should roll”
7.The Free Land of British LibertariaWA MemberAnarchy“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”
8.The Free Land of Borderless TerritoriesAnarchy“Live free or... well, live free, really”
9.The Voluntary Society of SibirskyAnarchy“Capitalismus sine modo, via ad prosperitatem”
10.The Democratic People's Republic of SergeyLeft-Leaning College State“Working Together For a Better World”
Page:  «  1  2  3  4  5  »

Regional Happenings

More...

Laissez Faireholm Regional Message Board

The Free Confederacy of Vecherd wrote:Nah. I highly doubt I will vote for them next election. They are warmongerers and very close minded, and in general all their politician are young angry/arrogant men thinking Ayn Rand is some kind of prophet.


Ah going full agorist then. Good luck.

Speaking of agorism, I knew a guy four years back, he ran a distillery in his parents basement (he was about 15). He supported Ron Paul for president. He smoked weed in the back of the school bus and somehow never got caught. I don't think he was aware of Konkin's ideology, but he was the literal definition of an agorist.

Cosmo Kramer

The Confederation of The Liberated Territories wrote:Ah going full agorist then. Good luck.

Speaking of agorism, I knew a guy four years back, he ran a distillery in his parents basement (he was about 15). He supported Ron Paul for president. He smoked weed in the back of the school bus and somehow never got caught. I don't think he was aware of Konkin's ideology, but he was the literal definition of an agorist.


Not necessarily. I could consider voting, but not for a party that wants to nuke Iran. There is a local election here in a couple of weeks, I'll tell update on their result.

Alao that guy sounds cool as all that

The Free Confederacy of Vecherd wrote:Nah. I highly doubt I will vote for them next election. They are warmongerers and very close minded, and in general all their politician are young angry/arrogant men thinking Ayn Rand is some kind of prophet.

That's unfortunate. I looked at their website and they look very progressive, supporting free movement of labour, social tolerance and a non-interventionist foreign policy.

The Pevvania of Cosmo Kramer wrote:That's unfortunate. I looked at their website and they look very progressive, supporting free movement of labour, social tolerance and a non-interventionist foreign policy.


Yeah well.. I was able to stay in their internal party forum on Facebook for quite some time. It's infested with racism towards muslims and neoconservatives. And even in public the leader supports nuking Iran. They are strict adherents of ARI objectivism and they write nice things on their page but that's as far as it goes. This party was basically started because their former party was so looked down up that they needed to rebrand.

Their official name in English is The Capitalist Party, because they view libertarianism as morally wrong.

Cosmo Kramer and The Liberated Territories

The Free Confederacy of Vecherd wrote:Yeah well.. I was able to stay in their internal party forum on Facebook for quite some time. It's infested with racism towards muslims and neoconservatives. And even in public the leader supports nuking Iran. They are strict adherents of ARI objectivism and they write nice things on their page but that's as far as it goes. This party was basically started because their former party was so looked down up that they needed to rebrand.

Their official name in English is The Capitalist Party, because they view libertarianism as morally wrong.

What a shame. Sounds like how UKIP were calling themselves a 'libertarian' party for a while.

The Pevvania of Cosmo Kramer wrote:What a shame. Sounds like how UKIP were calling themselves a 'libertarian' party for a while.


Yeah pretty much. Dont get me wrong they have some great policies, and are very radical. The problem is that some of that radicalism is taken in the wrong direction on many points. And I would rather vote for a moderately libertarian party that are better across the board on everything, than a party that are very good on certain points, and terrible at other points. Because we know that the areas where they want to implement more state power and spending(military 100% increase, and police 50% increase) are the easiest thing for them to get done.

The Liberated Territories

The Free Confederacy of Vecherd wrote:Yeah well.. I was able to stay in their internal party forum on Facebook for quite some time. It's infested with racism towards muslims and neoconservatives. And even in public the leader supports nuking Iran. They are strict adherents of ARI objectivism and they write nice things on their page but that's as far as it goes. This party was basically started because their former party was so looked down up that they needed to rebrand.

Their official name in English is The Capitalist Party, because they view libertarianism as morally wrong.


From the information I could gather up, the former party Liberal People's Party was originally a social liberal party that attempted to revive a party that existed in the past, however it was "taken over" by a group of objectivists and former Progressive Party members. I guess then they got a bad rap somewhere along the way and then tried rebranding themselves, although if you are "taking over" parties because you can't get your own off the ground, I don't think you deserve sympathy.

Although it is worth pointing out that they were apart of the new International Alliance of Libertarian Parties (AILP) and Interlibertarians and supported the efforts created by the Czech libertarians in the creation of Liberland. Why a bunch of objectivists would do this is beyond me, if they are principled enough not to label themselves as libertarian yet align with libertarian parties...?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_People%27s_Party_(Norway,_1972)
http://www.ialp.com/?page_id=290

The Confederation of The Liberated Territories wrote:From the information I could gather up, the former party Liberal People's Party was originally a social liberal party that attempted to revive a party that existed in the past, however it was "taken over" by a group of objectivists and former Progressive Party members. I guess then they got a bad rap somewhere along the way and then tried rebranding themselves, although if you are "taking over" parties because you can't get your own off the ground, I don't think you deserve sympathy.

Although it is worth pointing out that they were apart of the new International Alliance of Libertarian Parties (AILP) and Interlibertarians and supported the efforts created by the Czech libertarians in the creation of Liberland. Why a bunch of objectivists would do this is beyond me, if they are principled enough not to label themselves as libertarian yet align with libertarian parties...?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_People%27s_Party_(Norway,_1972)
http://www.ialp.com/?page_id=290


Yeah, the liberal peoples party split from the Liberal Party on the issue of joining the EU. By the 90s almost all the people in DLF had rejoined the Liberal Party and a professor took over the party in 2001ish and it turned more or less Objectivist, then some national conservatives tried to take it over from the Objectivists but failed. After that its been more of a objectivist think tank really, but standing for election in some counties(MPs are elected at county level). So since 2001 it has gotten around 100-900 votes every election, not really a lot. Yeah some Progress Party members have made a move from their party(FrP) to DLF, but most of the libertarians in FrP only talked about it, because they viewed DLF as wackjobs(and FrP is considered the wackjob party in national politics so that says a lot..). So 'Liberalistene'(literally in English would be 'The Libertarians') was founded by former members to make them seem not as crazy, but they kept roughly 95-99% of the party program, but without such a harsh way of wording themselves and more young people. They have been a bit more successful in gaining FrP supporters but in general same sh!t. Liberalistene does not bar AnCap members actually, although they bar religious people. So a tiny bit of liberalization of their party.

They have tried to branch out in the world, which is very hard considering there are very few objectivist parties in the world.(I can only think of the Objectivist Party USA and The LibertariaNZ in New Zealand). But yeah, they dislike libertarians yet have an uncomfortable alliance with Libertarian parties abroad.

Actually the United States has the weaponry to destroy the Iranian nuclear development bases (one does not bury civilian nuclear power stations deep underground or in the sides of mountains) WITHOUT using nuclear weapons.

I doubt that Israel has that ability. A nuclear attack may be its only option.

So if you do NOT want Iran nuked - then you will support American action.

However, if you are sincere noninterventionist......

You are at liberty to say - "Israel may nuke these Iranian development bases if its people favour such an action - it is nothing to do with us".

Of course no sincere noninterventionist will oppose any Israeli action - as "it has nothing to do with us" means just that.

This does leave aside the "little" problem that Iranian "Hasteners" (the regime NOT the people of Iran) do not "just" wish to destroy Israel.

For the "Hidden One" to return (on his white horse) far more than "just" six million Jews must be destroyed.

A private "Protection Agency" would not sit about till a "Hastener" nuclear bomb explodes in New York harbour.

Why should a government just sit about making absurd "this is not a treaty it is a deal" agreements with "Hasteners" who have no intention of keeping an agreement with the "Great Satan" (or any non "Hastener" - even fellow Muslims).

These are the alternatives.

Strike (as American can) with conventional weapons.

Or stand aside "it has nothing to do with us".

But if you choose the second option - do not complain if others attack with whatever weapons they must use.

By the way - if anyone calls out "end American government aid to Israel".

I actually agree with you.

I believe government aid to be corrupting - harming those it is supposed to help.

Forum View

by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics