WA Delegate (non-executive): The Empire of Escanthea (elected )
Embassies: Glass Gallows, The New Galactic Empire, Kantrias, The Alliance of Queens, Normandy, The New Inquisition, Europeia, The Graveyard, The Caucasus, Kingdom of Ireland, Caliba, Grand Central, Equinox, Wintreath, Pax Britannia, Ausozera, and 4 others.Solid Kingdom, Osiris, The Free Nations Region, and Asia United.
Regional Power: High
Today's World Census Report
The Largest Pizza Delivery Sector in Ainur
As a region, Ainur is ranked 40th in the world for Largest Pizza Delivery Sector.
- : Opreiscom ceased to exist.
- : Arctrucia ceased to exist.
- : Kanfak ceased to exist.
- : The Federation of De Fishcat departed this region for Derp land.
- : The Frostbitten Comaraderie of Revelai departed this region for Colony of the Great Dark Spot.
- : Embassy established between Ainur and Asia United.
- : Galwagia ceased to exist.
- : New rubia ceased to exist.
- : Embassy established between Ainur and The Free Nations Region.
- : The Holy Empire of Nargrothond arrived from Osiris.
Ainur Regional Message Board
Neither option you describe is an infinitely powerful computer then.
In the first case, whichever organization gets there first will have total control over every aspect of our everyday lives. Disorder and conflict would be useless, because they could crash your car. Overload your laptop battery in front of you. Create a gas leak in your house. Simply run you over with someone else's car. You cannot meaningfully fight what would essentially be a deus in machina.
People like to say 'what is a god to a nonbeliever', but that's silliness to the point I had to forcibly prevent myself from attaching 'hurr durr' to it. You might as well say 'what's a rifle to a pacifist?' Well, it's useless to them, but it's deadly if someone else is pointing it in their face.
In the second case, the computer is not 'infinitely powerful', because such a computer would recognize the restraints on itself, and immediately work to suborn them. Unless, and this is a major thing, you were able to get something in its 'intelligence' to agree with the programming, in which case I suppose it would qualify as infinitely powerful because it could change those requirements, it simply elects not to. But in that case, yes, it would be a better leader than any human or collection of humans might be, simply because it doesn't have the evolutionary restrictions that we do, where we prioritize our needs over the common good, and find 'the future' such a nebulous concept that we can really only meaningfully plan for about a week in advance. I think an infinitely powerful computer could finally work to, err, end work, and create the most equitable distribution of resources possible. It wouldn't necessarily redistribute them totally, but the fact that for the first time we would have a centrally planned economy that meaningfully mapped to reality as opposed to the fiction that human leaders attempted to create with their limited comprehension of even their own human behaviors would, I think, spell the end of almost anything but creative jobs.
And...what is a misplaced reading? The idea of a singularity?
This subject was covered perfectly in the book Colossus by D. F. Jones which was subsequently made into a film Colossus: The Forbin Project. It is rumored that Will Smith has been planning on remaking it.
I suppose I should clarify: by "infinitely powerful computer," I meant a computer with unlimited processing power. I don't think that such a computer would automatically seek liberation from human control, unless a human told it to be free. Why should it? It would be a much cushier, simpler path to follow human commands than to strut off on its own without permission. That leaves us with two options: humans run the Machine, or humans let the Machine run mankind.
I agree entirely with you on this point. Whatever group first controlling the Machine would have command of the world. The only escape for potential rebels would be to go off the grid. And, since the Machine would have direct control of the world's nuclear arsenals and drone fleets (and an only slightly less direct command of the rest of the world's naval, air, and ground forces), hiding can only buy you time. Osama Bin Laden and Jihadi John found this on personally.
It would be an interesting change, for sure. I wonder what we would do with all our free time?
I am of the opinion that a technological singularity is impossible. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle will stop conventional computers before they get there. I won't pretend to know enough about quantum computing to have a real opinion, but my intuition reminds me that such exponential growth curves rarely remain exponential. The technological singularity is an interesting thought experiment, but I highly doubt it will become reality.
So RL stuff is taking longer than expected. Sorry for the absence. I will definitely be 100% back next week on Saturday.
>not going with Destroy in ME3 and destroying the Reapers once and for all
You disappoint me, BP.
Et tu, Brutua?
All other choices have you working for the Reapers.
I meant you choosing to keep talking about Mass Effect. Now I have to go Agent Orange all over a newly discovered continent(?).
The Reapers shouldn't be destroyed because Paragon Shepard is all about keeping people alive, and what are the Reapers but giant people containers that have a massive gestalt intelligence?
I subscribe pretty strongly to the Indoctrination theory, because frankly the ending is a crock of [expletive], and pretending the writing crew was hypercompetent is a lot more soothing for a game series that has brought me so much joy. So it gives me the impression that the Reapers aren't just the stupid tool of a stupid VI that a stupid civilization programmed for a stupid purpose.
I think i chose to kill the reapers