Historical Resolutions
From the rise of civilization (November 13, 2002) up until a particularly brutal collision with reality (April 1, 2008), nations toiled under the banner of the World Assembly's predecessor, an organization that now Cannot Be Named, but sounded a lot like "United Stations." Although this grand institution is no longer, its incomparable volume of law shall stand forever.
Page: « 1 2 . . . 20 21 22 23 24 25 . . . 48 49 »
HISTORICAL RESOLUTION #108 Repeal "Elimination of Bio Weapons"A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation. | ||
Category: Repeal |
Resolution: #16 |
Proposed by: Reformentia |
Description: UN Resolution #16: Elimination of Bio Weapons (Category: Global Disarmament; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void. Argument: NOTING: UN resolution 16 for the "Elimination of Bio Weapons", although expressing an admirable goal, is completely inadequate to that goal. The text of the resolution contains nothing more than one statement describing the undesirable aspects of biological weapons and one statement saying its important to eliminate them. Unfortunately there are no statements: -- Defining a single criteria for what specific weapons it's talking about FURTHER NOTING: That given these shortcomings it is currently possible for any nation to do ALL of the following without EVER being in breach of resolution 16: --Produce biological weapons. IT IS PROPOSED: This resolution be repealed so that it may be replaced with a new, effective resolution. Votes For: 12,663 (80%) Implemented: Tue Jun 28 2005
| ||
HISTORICAL RESOLUTION #109 Nuclear ArmamentsA resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets. | ||
Category: International Security |
Strength: Mild |
Proposed by: |
Description: REALIZING that UN members are outnumbered by non members by about 3 to 1, ACKNOWLEDGEING the fact that UN resolutions only affect UN members, NOTICING the fact that many non member nations are hostile towards UN members, REALIZING that the UN members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked, NOTICING that the UN has twice defeated resolutions attempting to ban UN members from possessing nuclear weapons, 1. DECLARES that UN members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations, 2. PRESERVES the right for individual nations to decide if they want to possess nuclear weapons. Votes For: 8,379 (55%) Implemented: Sun Jul 3 2005
| ||
HISTORICAL RESOLUTION #110 United Nations Security ActA resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets. | ||
Category: International Security |
Strength: Mild |
Proposed by: Texan hotrodders |
Description: The NationStates United Nations, NOTING that warfare and violence are not acts which this body wishes to encourage. NOTING WITH REGRET that there are certain unavoidable situations in which warfare and violence are necessary for the defense of sovereign persons and nations. CONCERNED that many member nations are ill-equipped to conduct an effective defense of the sovereign persons and nations. FURTHER CONCERNED that there are many nations that are not members of this body and are hostile to it and may attack the member states of this body. ENCOURAGES all member states to ensure that they have the ability to effectively defend their sovereign nation from attack in the interest of protecting their citizens. DECLARES that all member states have the right to construct and utilize any and all weapons that are necessary to defend their nation from attack, except where previous legislation by this body that is still in effect has placed restrictions on that right. Votes For: 9,667 (58%) Implemented: Fri Jul 8 2005
| ||
HISTORICAL RESOLUTION #111 Civilian Rights Post WarA resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights. | ||
Category: Human Rights |
Strength: Strong |
Proposed by: |
Description: Recognising war is an inevitable part of the NationStates world. Fully aware there is a standing resolution already protecting the rights of POWs. Alarmed by the absence of protections for non-combatants living in an occupied nation after a war has ended, and the possible abuses that can and are being perpetrated against conquered civilians by invading nations. Convinced measures are necessary for the protection and fair treatment of non-combatants not involved in the armed forces of any nation involved in the war. A non-combatant is a civilian of any age who did not take up arms against the invading nation either before or after the cessation of hostilities. Declares that immediately following the cessation of hostilities in any war all UN invader nation(s) involved in the occupation will implement the following . - All conquered non-combatants must be treated with dignity and respect regardless of sex, age, position in society, religion or cultural group - No non-combatant will be subjected to summary execution. - The invading nation must rapidly restore medical services and hospitals within the conquered nation and provide medical aid to those non-combatants who require it. Any civilian who takes up arms after the cessation of hostilities and actively seeks confrontation with the invading nation may no longer be considered a non-combatant. Votes For: 10,532 (72%) Implemented: Wed Jul 13 2005
| ||
HISTORICAL RESOLUTION #112 Repeal "National Systems of Tax"A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation. | ||
Category: Repeal |
Resolution: #105 |
Proposed by: Powerhungry chipmunks |
Description: UN Resolution #105: National Systems of Tax (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void. Argument: The United Nations, APPLAUDING National Systems of Tax for upholding nations rights to self-determination in the area of tax systems, RECOGNIZING the short treatment, however, which National Systems of Tax gives some very important, international issues concerning tax systems (such as tariffs and international tax incentives), NOTING, ESPECIALLY, the resolution authors willingness and desire to address such issues, ACKNOWLEDGING, with reluctance, the mechanical need to repeal National Systems of Tax in order to re-address those important international issues and to more adequately secure national rights, ASSURING member nations of future legislation, which will be more comprehensive and explanatory in scope, more serviceable to member nations in protecting their rights to determining their own tax systems, while more permitting of international determination of international taxation issues: REPEALS National Systems of Tax. Votes For: 10,510 (78%) Implemented: Mon Jul 18 2005
| ||








